Amit Shah wrote:
> * On Wednesday 15 Oct 2008 12:41:17 Sheng Yang wrote:
>> On Wednesday 15 October 2008 15:03:39 Amit Shah wrote:
>>> * On Wednesday 15 Oct 2008 08:06:30 Sheng Yang wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -4115,6 +4116,9 @@ struct  kvm *kvm_arch_create_vm(void)
>>>>>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
>>>>>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.assigned_dev_head);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +       /* Reserve bit 0 of irq_sources_bitmap for userspace irq
>>>>>> source */ +       kvm->arch.irq_sources_bitmap = 1;
>>>>>> +
>>>> 
>>>> Amit, could you help to use 1 << KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID here,
>>>> I come to think it's more proper. :)
>>> 
>>> This is fine; if you think there has to be a change, the change
>>> could be done in the .h: 
>>> 
>>> - #define KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID        0
>>> + #define KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID        1 << 0
>> 
>> Well, I think it's a semantics thing... irq_sources_bitmap is a
>> bitmap, it can't equal to a source_id... So maybe
>> 
>> set_bit(KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, &kvm->arch.irq_sources_bitmap);
>> 
>> is the best way here. :)
> 
> OK; I see your point. Can you work with Xiantao and update the patch?

Okay, I will update the patch to make it work for ia64. Thanks!
Xiantao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to