Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch only implements the bare minimum support to get a guest booting. It
has very little impact the rest of QEMU and attempts to integrate nicely with
the rest of QEMU.
Huh? That isn't based on the qemu-accel patches ...
This is part of the reason for this exercise. I'd rather introduce KVM
support first and then look at abstracting things, than vice versa. A
number of the hooks in the current QEMUAccel tree are there for the
wrong reason (to support the out-of-tree IO thread, for instance).
If you just introduce something with various hooks and say, these are
hooks we'll need, it's not possible to really evaluate whether the hooks
are needed because nothing in the tree makes use of them.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
surprised,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
