On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 21/04/2015 16:07, Catalin Vasile wrote:
> > I don't get the part with getting cryptodev upstream.
> > I don't know what getting cryptodev upstream actually implies.
> > From what I know cryptodev is done (is a functional project) that was
> > rejected in the Linux Kernel
> > and there isn't actually way to get it upstream.
> 
> Yes, I agree.

The limitations of AF_ALG need to addressed somehow, so what is the next
step?

Stefan

Attachment: pgpDV1dGiX8CC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to