On 23/06/2015 11:47, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>
>> The current implementation is potentially more flexible but makes the
>> MSR handling a little more awkward since the host_initiated bool needs
>> to be passed around (patch 09). I guess either approach seems ok to
>> me.
>>
>> Also, if this patchset is used then it looks like
>> HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS can be removed.
> 
> Paolo,
> 
> do you have any opinion on this? I prefer
> configurable way but there is no problem
> to enable it by default dropping 'hv_panic'
> property.

I also prefer the configurable way.  Would hv_panic prevent
reboot-on-BSOD from rebooting the VM?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to