On Fri, 10/09 11:25, charlie.song wrote:
> At 2015-10-08 23:37:02, "Fam Zheng" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On Thu, 10/08 19:59, charlie.song wrote:
> >> Dear KVM Developers: 
> >>     I am Xiang Song from UCloud company. We currently encounter a weird 
> >> phenomenon about Qemu-KVM IOthread. 
> >>     We recently try to use Linux AIO from guest OS and find that the 
> >> IOthread mechanism of Qemu-KVM will reorder I/O requests from guest OS 
> >> even when the AIO write requests are issued from a single thread in order. 
> >> This does not happen on the host OS however.
> >>     We are not sure whether this is a feature of Qemu-KVM IOthread 
> >> mechanism or a Bug.
> >>  
> >> The testbd is as following: (the guest disk device cache is configured to 
> >> writethrough.)
> >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650
> >> QEMU version: 1.5.3
> >> Host/Guest Kernel:  Both Linux 4.1.8 & Linux 2.6.32, OS type CentOS 6.5
> >> Simplified Guest OS qemu cmd:  
> >> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -machine rhel6.3.0,accel=kvm,usb=off -cpu kvm64 -smp 
> >> 8,sockets=8,cores=1,threads=1 
> >> -drive 
> >> file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/song-disk.img,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=qcow2,serial=UCLOUD_DISK_VDA,cache=writethrough
> >>  
> >> -device 
> >> virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:22:d5:52,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4
> >
> >You mentioned iothread above but it's not in your command line?
> I means the thread pool mechanism used by qemu-kvm to accelerate I/O
> processing.This is used by paio_submit (block/raw-posix.c) by default and
> with pool->max_threads = 64 as I know. (qemu-kvm version 1.5.3)

The thread pool parallism may reorder non-overlapping requests, but it
shouldn't cause any reordering of overlapping requests like the case in your io
pattern. QEMU ensures that.

Do you see this with aio=native?

Fam

> 
> >
> >> 
> >> The test code triggerring this phenomenon work as following: it use linux 
> >> aio API to issue concurrent async write requests to a file. During 
> >> exection it will 
> >> continuously write data into target test file. There are total 'X' jobs, 
> >> and each job is assigned a job id JOB_ID which starts from 0. Each job 
> >> will write 16 * 512
> >> Byte data into the target file at offset =  JOB_ID * 512. (the data is 
> >> repeated uint64_t  JOB_ID). 
> >>     There is only one thread handling 'X' jobs one by one through Linux 
> >> AIO (io_submit) cmd. When handling jobs, it will continuously 
> >> issuing AIO requests without waiting for AIO Callbacks. When it finishes, 
> >> the file should look like:
> >>          [0....0][1...1][2...2][3...3]...[X-1...X-1]
> >>     Then we use a check program to test the resulting file, it can 
> >> continuously read the first 8 byte (uint64_t) of each sector and print it 
> >> out. In normal cases,
> >>  it's output is like:
> >>           0 1 2 3 .... X-1
> >> 
> >> Exec  output: (Set X=32)
> >> In our guest OS, the output is abnormal: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 
> >> 14 15 16 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31. 
> >>     It can be seen that job20~job24 are overwrited by job19.
> >> In our host OS, the output is as expected, 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 
> >> 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31.
> >
> >I'm not 100% sure but I don't think the returning of io_submit guarantees any
> >ordering, usually you need to wait for the callback to ensure that.
> Is there any proof or artical about the ordering of io_submit requests?
> >
> >Fam
> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I can provide the example code if needed.
> >> 
> >> Best regards, song
> >> 
> >> 2015-10-08
> >> 
> >> 
> >> charlie.song 
> >>   
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> >> the body of a message to [email protected]
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to