Alexander Graf wrote:
> SVM has some cleanup code, that tries to reinject interrupts and exceptions
> when the guest didn't manage to deal with them yet. It basically transfers
> them to KVM internal state.
> 
> Unfortunately, the internal state is reserved for the L1 guest state, so we
> shouldn't try to go through that logic when running a nested guest.
> 
> When doing something the host KVM can handle, let's just reinject the event
> into the L2 guest, because we didn't touch its state anyways.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f12a669..61efd13 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -2349,7 +2349,10 @@ static int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       trace_kvm_exit(exit_code, svm->vmcb->save.rip);
>  
>       if (is_nested(svm)) {
> +             struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
>               int vmexit;
> +             int type;
> +             int vec;
>  
>               nsvm_printk("nested handle_exit: 0x%x | 0x%lx | 0x%lx | 
> 0x%lx\n",
>                           exit_code, svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1,
> @@ -2362,9 +2365,18 @@ static int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>               if (vmexit == NESTED_EXIT_DONE)
>                       return 1;
> -     }
>  
> -     svm_complete_interrupts(svm);
> +             type = control->exit_int_info & SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_MASK;
> +             vec = control->exit_int_info & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VEC_MASK;
> +             if ((type == SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_INTR) ||
> +                 ((type == SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_EXEPT) && 
> !kvm_exception_is_soft(vec))) {
> +                     control->event_inj = control->exit_int_info;
> +                     control->event_inj_err = control->exit_int_info_err;
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             /* Don't interpret exit_info for nested guests */

Doesn't this comment belong to the block above?

> +             svm_complete_interrupts(svm);
> +     }
>  
>       if (npt_enabled) {
>               int mmu_reload = 0;
> @@ -2602,8 +2614,6 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm 
> *svm)
>       case SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_EXEPT:
>               /* In case of software exception do not reinject an exception
>                  vector, but re-execute and instruction instead */
> -             if (is_nested(svm))
> -                     break;
>               if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vector))
>                       break;
>               if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) {

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to