On 12/03/2010 07:33 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:29:06AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> That's what Marcelo's suggestion does w/out a fill thread.
Are we willing to add that to KVM sources?
I'd rather avoid it.
I was working under the constraints of not modifying the kernel (especially
avoid adding short term hacks that become unnecessary in longer run, in this
case when kernel-based hard limits goes in).
Yes. Allowing the guest to execute HLT is fine, but adding scheduling
smarts to kvm is something else.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
