On 12/03/2010 08:12 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:07:15PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> My first reaction is that it's not terribly important to account the
> non-idle time in the guest because of the use-case for this model.
Agreed ...but I was considering the larger user-base who may be surprised to see
their VMs being reported as 100% hogs when they had left it idle.
The larger user base won't enable this option.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
