On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:10:39 +0100 Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 10.12.2012, at 10:06, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:45:47 +0100 > > Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On 07.12.2012, at 13:29, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> > >>> This code is transport agnostic and can be used by both the legacy > >>> virtio code and virtio_ccw. > >> > >> This code should die. It's a nightmare to implement in QEMU, because it > >> ends up being a separate char device. I'd prefer if we don't carry it over > >> to the virtio-ccw world :). > > > > I don't really want to kill an interface in a patchset adding a new > > transport. We may kill this later on, though... > > I fully agree :). What I was trying to say is "leave this to die in the old > code and don't bother about it in the new world order". Removing support for > the old kvm virtio machine is nothing for today. Ah, OK. I'll merge the return -ENODEV into the first patch then and drop this one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
