From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>

These exits have no preconditions, and we already process the
corresponding reasons in nested_vmx_exit_handled correctly.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 7bd9f88..26d47e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2080,6 +2080,7 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
                CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING | CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
                CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING |
                CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING | CPU_BASED_RDTSC_EXITING |
+               CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING |
                CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
        /*
         * We can allow some features even when not supported by the
@@ -2094,7 +2095,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
                nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high);
        nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low = 0;
        nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &=
-               SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
+               SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
+               SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING;
 }
 
 static inline bool vmx_control_verify(u32 control, u32 low, u32 high)
-- 
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to