On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:34:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
>
> These exits have no preconditions, and we already process the
> corresponding reasons in nested_vmx_exit_handled correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 7bd9f88..26d47e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2080,6 +2080,7 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
> CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING | CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING | CPU_BASED_RDTSC_EXITING |
> + CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
> /*
> * We can allow some features even when not supported by the
> @@ -2094,7 +2095,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
> nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high);
> nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low = 0;
> nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &=
> - SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
> + SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
> + SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING;
> }
>
> static inline bool vmx_control_verify(u32 control, u32 low, u32 high)
> --
> 1.7.3.4
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
