On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:43:16AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> For TMR issue, since it has nothing to do with APICv, if we really need to
> >> handle
> > it later, then we may need a separate patch to fix it. But currently, we may
> > focused on APICv only.
> >>
> > What do you mean by "TMR has nothing to do with APICv"?
> Just ignore it. I will send out the fixing with APICv patch.
>
Does this mean we cannot get away with updating TMR like we do now?
Because if we can I prefer to not complicate the code further.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
