Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-03-18: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:43:16AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: >>>> For TMR issue, since it has nothing to do with APICv, if we really need to > handle >>> it later, then we may need a separate patch to fix it. But currently, we may >>> focused on APICv only. >>>> >>> What do you mean by "TMR has nothing to do with APICv"? >> Just ignore it. I will send out the fixing with APICv patch. >> > Does this mean we cannot get away with updating TMR like we do now? > Because if we can I prefer to not complicate the code further. No, we still need to update TMR but only in vcpu context.
Best regards, Yang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
