Hi!

> I'm afraid this is not enough. A write to GICR_TRANSLATER (DID+EID)
> results in a (LPI,CPU) pair. Can you easily express the CPU part in
> irqfd (this is a genuine question, I'm not familiar enough with that
> part of the core)?

 But... As far as i could understand, LPI is added to a collection as a part of 
setup. And
collection actually represents a destination CPU, doesn't it? And we can't have 
multiple
LPIs sharing the same number and going to different CPUs. Or am i wrong? 
Unfortunately i
don't have GICv3 arch reference manual.

> Another concern
> would be the support of GICv4, which relies on the command queue
> handling to be handled in the kernel

 Wow, i didn't know about GICv4.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to