On 08/06/15 11:54, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I'm afraid this is not enough. A write to GICR_TRANSLATER (DID+EID)
>> results in a (LPI,CPU) pair. Can you easily express the CPU part in
>> irqfd (this is a genuine question, I'm not familiar enough with that
>> part of the core)?
>
> But... As far as i could understand, LPI is added to a collection as a part
> of setup. And
> collection actually represents a destination CPU, doesn't it? And we can't
> have multiple
> LPIs sharing the same number and going to different CPUs. Or am i wrong?
> Unfortunately i
> don't have GICv3 arch reference manual.
This is true to some extent. But the point is that the result of the
translation is both an LPI and a CPU. My question was how you would
indicate convey the notion of a target vcpu when using irqfd. As far as
I know this doesn't really fit, unless we start introducing the dreaded
GSI routing...
Do we really want to go down that road?
>> Another concern
>> would be the support of GICv4, which relies on the command queue
>> handling to be handled in the kernel
>
> Wow, i didn't know about GICv4.
I wish I didn't know about it.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
