Hi,

On 06/09/2017 15:05, wanghaibin wrote:
> This patch fix the migrate save tables failure.
> 
> When the virtual machine is in booting and the devices haven't initialized,
> the all virtual dte/ite may be invalid. If migrate at this moment, the save
> tables interface traversal device list, and check the dte is valid or not.
> if not, it will return the -EINVAL.

The issue on save is less clear to me. We are not checking the "dte" are
valid as it is said above. We are scrolling the ITS lists - which may be
empty - and dump them in guest memory.

On save() there are quite few checks that can cause a failure.
vgic_its_check_id() can be among them. This typically requires the
GITS_BASER to have been properly set. Failing on save looks OK to me in
such situation.

Sorry but I don't get the purpose of this patch. Does it fix a save failure?

Thanks

Eric


> 
> This patch try to free the its list resource when vm reboot or reset to avoid 
> this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <[email protected]>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c           |  5 ++++-
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index a39a1e1..db7632d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_coproc.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_psci.h>
>  #include <asm/sections.h>
> +#include "vgic.h"
>  
>  #ifdef REQUIRES_VIRT
>  __asm__(".arch_extension     virt");
> @@ -901,8 +902,10 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu,
>        * Ensure a rebooted VM will fault in RAM pages and detect if the
>        * guest MMU is turned off and flush the caches as needed.
>        */
> -     if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
> +     if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) {
>               stage2_unmap_vm(vcpu->kvm);
> +             vgic_its_free_resource(vcpu->kvm);
> +     }
>  
>       vcpu_reset_hcr(vcpu);
>  
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 25d614f..5c20352 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -2467,6 +2467,16 @@ static int vgic_its_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>       .has_attr = vgic_its_has_attr,
>  };
>  
> +void vgic_its_free_resource(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +     struct kvm_device *dev, *tmp;
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &kvm->devices, vm_node) {
> +             if(dev->ops == &kvm_arm_vgic_its_ops)
> +                     vgic_its_free_list(kvm, dev->private);
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  int kvm_vgic_register_its_device(void)
>  {
>       return kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_its_ops,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> index c2be5b7..fbcbdfd 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -222,5 +222,6 @@ int vgic_v3_line_level_info_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu, bool is_write,
>  
>  bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void unlock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void vgic_its_free_resource(struct kvm *kvm);
>  
>  #endif
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to