On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 09:59:21AM +0800, wanghaibin wrote:
> On 2017/9/14 3:14, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 09:05:08PM +0800, wanghaibin wrote:
> >> We slightly refactor vgic_its_destroy, separate vgic_its_free_list()
> >> function for later patch invoke.
> >>
> >> The patch also take a functional change. If the its->device_list.next
> > 
> > I don't see a functional change in this patch?
> 
> 
> I mean, if this check can its->device_list.next happened, this patch will
> free the its structure compared with the original implementation.
> 

I really cannot see how this patch alone changes anything at all.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to