On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:38:30PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index aabeaee..fa4ed34 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,32 @@ static void fpsimd_to_sve(struct task_struct *task)
> sizeof(fst->vregs[i]));
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Transfer the SVE state in task->thread.sve_state to
> + * task->thread.fpsimd_state.
> + *
> + * Task can be a non-runnable task, or current. In the latter case,
> + * softirqs (and preemption) must be disabled.
> + * task->thread.sve_state must point to at least sve_state_size(task)
> + * bytes of allocated kernel memory.
> + * task->thread.sve_state must be up to date before calling this function.
> + */
> +static void sve_to_fpsimd(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + unsigned int vq;
> + void const *sst = task->thread.sve_state;
> + struct fpsimd_state *fst = &task->thread.fpsimd_state;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!system_supports_sve())
> + return;
> +
> + vq = sve_vq_from_vl(task->thread.sve_vl);
> + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
> + memcpy(&fst->vregs[i], ZREG(sst, vq, i),
> + sizeof(fst->vregs[i]));
> +}
Nit: could we actually just do an assignment with some pointer casting?
It looks like we invoke memcpy for every 16 bytes (same for
fpsimd_to_sve).
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
