Hi Eric,
On 12/15/20 1:58 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Alexandru,
>
> On 12/10/20 3:45 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 12/3/20 1:39 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>
>>> static void check_spurious(void)
>>> @@ -300,7 +318,8 @@ static void ipi_test_self(void)
>>> cpumask_clear(&mask);
>>> cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>>> gic->ipi.send_self();
>>> - check_acked("IPI: self", &mask);
>>> + wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
>>> + report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
>>> report_prefix_pop();
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -315,7 +334,8 @@ static void ipi_test_smp(void)
>>> for (i = smp_processor_id() & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
>>> cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
>>> gic_ipi_send_mask(IPI_IRQ, &mask);
>>> - check_acked("IPI: directed", &mask);
>>> + wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
>>> + report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
>>> both ipi_test_smp and ipi_test_self are called from the same test so
>>> better to use different error messages like it was done originally.
>> I used the same error message because the tests have a different prefix
>> ("target-list" versus "broadcast"). Do you think there are cases where
>> that's not
>> enough?
> I think in "ipi" test,
> ipi_test -> ipi_send -> ipi_test_self, ipi_test_smp
I'm afraid I don't understand what you are trying to say. This is the log for
the
gicv3-ipi test:
$ cat logs/gicv3-ipi.log
timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 -nodefaults -machine
virt,gic-version=host,accel=kvm -cpu host -device virtio-serial-device -device
virtconsole,chardev=ctd -chardev testdev,id=ctd -device pci-testdev -display
none
-serial stdio -kernel arm/gic.flat -smp 6 -machine gic-version=3 -append ipi #
-initrd /tmp/tmp.trk6aAcaZx
WARNING: early print support may not work. Found uart at 0x9000000, but early
base
is 0x3f8.
PASS: gicv3: ipi: self: Interrupts received
PASS: gicv3: ipi: target-list: Interrupts received
PASS: gicv3: ipi: broadcast: Interrupts received
SUMMARY: 3 tests
The warning is because I forgot to reconfigure the tests with --vmm=qemu.
Would you mind pointing out what you think is ambiguous?
Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
