Hi Alexandru,
On 12/16/20 12:40 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 12/15/20 1:58 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Alexandru,
>>
>> On 12/10/20 3:45 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> On 12/3/20 1:39 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> static void check_spurious(void)
>>>> @@ -300,7 +318,8 @@ static void ipi_test_self(void)
>>>> cpumask_clear(&mask);
>>>> cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>>>> gic->ipi.send_self();
>>>> - check_acked("IPI: self", &mask);
>>>> + wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
>>>> + report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
>>>> report_prefix_pop();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -315,7 +334,8 @@ static void ipi_test_smp(void)
>>>> for (i = smp_processor_id() & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
>>>> cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
>>>> gic_ipi_send_mask(IPI_IRQ, &mask);
>>>> - check_acked("IPI: directed", &mask);
>>>> + wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
>>>> + report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
>>>> both ipi_test_smp and ipi_test_self are called from the same test so
>>>> better to use different error messages like it was done originally.
>>> I used the same error message because the tests have a different prefix
>>> ("target-list" versus "broadcast"). Do you think there are cases where
>>> that's not
>>> enough?
>> I think in "ipi" test,
>> ipi_test -> ipi_send -> ipi_test_self, ipi_test_smp
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand what you are trying to say. This is the log for
> the
> gicv3-ipi test:
>
> $ cat logs/gicv3-ipi.log
> timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 -nodefaults
> -machine
> virt,gic-version=host,accel=kvm -cpu host -device virtio-serial-device -device
> virtconsole,chardev=ctd -chardev testdev,id=ctd -device pci-testdev -display
> none
> -serial stdio -kernel arm/gic.flat -smp 6 -machine gic-version=3 -append ipi #
> -initrd /tmp/tmp.trk6aAcaZx
> WARNING: early print support may not work. Found uart at 0x9000000, but early
> base
> is 0x3f8.
> PASS: gicv3: ipi: self: Interrupts received
> PASS: gicv3: ipi: target-list: Interrupts received
> PASS: gicv3: ipi: broadcast: Interrupts received
> SUMMARY: 3 tests
>
> The warning is because I forgot to reconfigure the tests with --vmm=qemu.
>
> Would you mind pointing out what you think is ambiguous?
Hum sorry I did not pay attention to the report_prefix_push() within
ipi_test_self & ipi_test_smp. I had in mind those were only in the main().
Forgive me for the noise
Eric
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
