On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 19:12 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Refactor the posted interrupt helper to take the desired notification > vector instead of a bool so that the callers are self-documenting. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 78c8bc7f1b3b..f505fee3cf5c 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -3928,11 +3928,9 @@ static void vmx_msr_filter_changed(struct kvm_vcpu > *vcpu) > } > > static inline bool kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > - bool nested) > + int pi_vec) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > - int pi_vec = nested ? POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR : POSTED_INTR_VECTOR; > - > if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) { > /* > * The vector of interrupt to be delivered to vcpu had > @@ -3986,7 +3984,7 @@ static int vmx_deliver_nested_posted_interrupt(struct > kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > */ > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu); > /* the PIR and ON have been set by L1. */ > - if (!kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, true)) > + if (!kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, > POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR)) > kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu); > return 0; > } > @@ -4024,7 +4022,7 @@ static int vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu > *vcpu, int vector) > * guaranteed to see PID.ON=1 and sync the PIR to IRR if triggering a > * posted interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE. > */ > - if (!kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, false)) > + if (!kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR)) > kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu); > > return 0;
I both like and don't like this patch. It is indeed a bit more more self documented, but then it allows caller to pass anything other than POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR/POSTED_INTR_VECTOR which would fail. Maybe addd an assert? I won't do bikesheddding about this though, so Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]> Best regards, Maxim Levitsky _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
