2010.11.11 17:47, Aron Xu rašė:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:40, Rimas Kudelis<[email protected]> wrote:
Interestingly enough, relevant locales I see in Pootle are: zh_CN, zh_HK,
zh_TW.
Which I guess means that these are the codes that will be used at least for
3.3. ;)
Well, zh_CN and zh_SG shoul fall in Hans's category, but I've never
seen any people translating software to zh_SG, they just use zh_CN
directly.
Which is exactly why zh_Hans is more correct. ;)
zh_HK and zh_TW fall in Hant's category, which should have a solution.
If we define it like zh...@hant, the modifier @hant can be omitted,
because there is nothing else could make people puzzled if the
modifier does not present. (In fact @hant could be used to help put
correct files into correct language pack, :D )
I didn't say there *has* to be only one Chinese Traditional language
pack. ;) It would make sense to have a "general" Hant language pack if
we only had one localization, but if we have two, we can have two
language packs too.
I suggest we stop this discussion here, or go off-list in order not to
bother people too much... ;)
Rimas
--
E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
