>
> >>>>o) time - depending on need's importance vs urgency, if
> dynamic PTI
> >>>>tables population is to be there in a couple of month, or
> in a couple of
> >>>>years (would like to point out that understimating the
> time it may take
> >>>>to convince l1/trans networks to make use of BGP may be impacting)
> >>>
> >>>I think I understand the timing issue, but what is the specific
> >>>'problem' with BGP in relation to L1 transport network?
> >>>(with BGP being used for the purpose of discovery)
> >>
> >>afaik, there is no large "install base" as for IP/MPLS (L3VPN)
> >
> > Okay, but debatable. there is probably no large base of
> anything in this
> > area.
>
> at least creating a small install base took some time ;-)
>
Fair enough. What I meant to indicate is that considering the small
installed base, this is not really an argument against BGP or in favor
of OSPF in this case.
> picking your words if there is no large control plane
> deployment in the
> L1 networks can we assume that L1VPN would become a real
> driver for such
> large scale deployment ? and by when ?
>
L1VPN will be one of the important drivers I think. By when .. I do not
know. Already in research / GRID networks this is becoming an important
topic (these typically need inter-domain solutions btw).
/Eduard
_______________________________________________
L1vpn mailing list
L1vpn@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
