Dimitri,
>> "- Dimitri: Please clarity the use of PCE
>> - Tomonori: As Adrian said, CCAMP has selected PCE. L1VPN is not
requiring
>> the use of PCE, but recognising the possiblity of using PCE for P&R"
>
> but this is not what adrian could have said as i've never seen a
statement
> such as L1VPN recognizes the possibility of using PCE for P&R ... as
> there is no CE dual homing discussion since so far
In fact, what I said is recorded pretty well in the minutes immediately
above. To remind you, I was speaking from the floor as CCAMP chair.
Adrian: CCAMP has a work item for multi-domain recovery.
The L1VPN CE has a different visibility from the core network so
is like multi-domain.
For the unprotected case in multi-domain, CCAMP found that PCE
would be a good approach
I may expect a similar approach from CCAMP for protected
multi-domain.
You are right that L1VPN has not started work on P&R in any detail, and
functions like CE dual homing are beyond the scope of the Basic Model. So,
nothing is decided.
Tomonori stressed that L1VPN does not require the use of PCE. He is also
correct to say that we should recognise and discuss the possility of using
PCE to resolve questions of computational visiblity.
A
PS. Thanks for the other comments below.
>
> "Dimitri: It is a timing issue; They have today an OSPF environment and
> are willing to deploy quickly.
> BGP may be a solution in 4-5 years"
>
> the last part of the message was "No doubt that BGP is a sensible
> approach, but if we have to base our timing
> by relying on IGP deployment experience, BGP may be the solution of
choice
> in 4-5 years."
>
> "Yakov: Update on the BGP-based auto-discovery
> We don't want to have a new AFI, we just need a new SAFI
> New format for l1vpn LNRI"
>
> guess you mean NLRI
>
>
>
>
>
> "Adrian Farrel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 10/04/2006 15:25
> Please respond to Adrian Farrel
>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject: [L1vpn] Draft minutes uploaded
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review the minutes at
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/minutes/l1vpn.html
>
> Comments on the list or to the chairs.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> L1vpn mailing list
> L1vpn@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
L1vpn mailing list
L1vpn@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
