Yes creating extranets is currently done in L3VPN. I would assume that this is 
also creating when extending a customers VPN into a VPC ( Virtual Private Cloud 
).. IMO NVO3 is focused on only the overlay technology and not on the service 
realization.

Jim Uttaro

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Xuxiaohu
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 9:53 PM
To: Yakov Rekhter; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; L3VPN
Subject: re: The possibility of using global MPLS labels as VNIs ... for l3vpn



> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Yakov
> Rekhter
> 发送时间: 2013年7月19日 21:23
> 收件人: [email protected]
> 抄送: L3VPN
> 主题: Re: The possibility of using global MPLS labels as VNIs ... for l3vpn
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> > 2013-07-18, Xuxiaohu:
> > >
> > > Till now, it seem that the only remaining technical reason for some
> > > people to prefer VXLAN/NVGRE encapsulation format to
> > > MAC-in-MPLS-in-IP encapsulation format for network virtualization
> > > overlay is the former has global VNIs while the latter doesn't have.
> > > If this reason is true, why can't we consider the possibility of
> > > using global MPLS labels to achieve the same goal?
> >
> > IMHO, examining *why* someone would want a "global VNI" should be the
> > start of the discussion, rather than possible solutions.
> >
> > I could possibly see at least one reason *not* to try to have a
> > dedicated identifier in the dataplane common for all flows of "a VPN".
> > It is not related to the encapsulation, but to the fact that RFC4364
> > has, in fact, no strict notion of "a VPN", but only of how connectivity
> > is established betweens set of VRFs.
> 
> Moreover, connectivity between set of VRFs is not "cast in concrete".
> To the contrary it could change, as extranets are formed/dissolved,
> and the process of forming/dissolving extranets could be fairly
> dynamic.

Is extranet is a normal requirement for Layer3 DC network virtualization 
overlay? I haven't seen any description of this in the NVo3 requirement and 
framework drafts yet.

Best regards,
Xiaohu

> Yakov.
> 
> >
> > -Thomas
> >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________
> ______________
> ___________________________________________
> >
> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentie
> lles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> > ce
>  message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> > elect
> roniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> fal
> sifie. Merci.
> >
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> inform
> ation that may be protected by law;
> > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> th
> is message and its attachments.
> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> mod
> ified, changed or falsified.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >

Reply via email to