I suggest you read the following blog post by Yakov 
(http://opencontrail.org/why-contrail-is-using-bgpmpls/).

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2013年11月25日 15:27
> 收件人: Xuxiaohu; [email protected]
> 抄送: [email protected]
> 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: New Version Notification for
> draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02.txt
> 
> There are easier ways to do this which don’t required data-plane changes.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-inter-subnet-forwardin
> g-02
> 
> On 25/11/13 07:40, "Xuxiaohu" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----邮件原件-----
> >> 发件人: Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> 发送时间: 2013年11月25日 14:29
> >> 收件人: Xuxiaohu; [email protected]
> >> 抄送: [email protected]
> >> 主题: Re: 答复: New Version Notification for
> >> draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02.txt
> >>
> >> It is not about TTL 1, no TTL decrement should happen for
> >>intra-subnet  forwarding at all On top you need to modify the
> >>data-plane to achieve this,  since it now needs to find out if it is
> >>intra or inter subnet where current PE(s)  don’t have to do this.
> >
> >Sure, it needs some change to the implementation of PE routers. That's
> >why we need a draft to specify the implementation requirements.
> >
> >> On 25/11/13 07:22, "Xuxiaohu" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Wim,
> >> >
> >> >It said clearly "if the source and destination addresses of a packet
> >> >whose TTL is set to 1 belong to the same extended subnet, both
> >> >ingress and egress PE routers MUST NOT decrement the TTL of such
> >> >packet." Did you doubt that the PE routers could know whether the
> >> >source and destination address belong to the same extended subnet?
> >> >
> >> >Xiaohu
> >> >
> >> >> -----邮件原件-----
> >> >> 发件人: Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
> >> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> 发送时间: 2013年11月25日 14:08
> >> >> 收件人: Xuxiaohu; [email protected]
> >> >> 抄送: [email protected]
> >> >> 主题: Re: New Version Notification for
> >> >>draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02.txt
> >> >>
> >> >> On the TTL issue I believe this is not addressing the issue. We
> >> >>can say don’t  decrement but when and how will the PE(s) do or don’t.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 25/11/13 03:22, "Xuxiaohu" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Major changes since the -01 version include:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >1) add a section about TTL consideration;
> >> >> >2) remove the section of PE Router FIB Reduction;
> >> >> >3) remove the section of PE Router RIB Reduction;
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Any further comments are welcome. BTW, the removed sections as
> >> >> >mentioned above would be described in separate docs.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Best regards,
> >> >> >Xiaohu
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> -----邮件原件-----
> >> >> >> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> >> 发送时间: 2013年11月25日 10:10
> >> >> >> 收件人: Brendan Fee; Susan Hares; Fan Yongbing; Xuxiaohu;
> >> >> >>Xuxiaohu; Christian  Jacquenet; Truman Boyes; Yongbing Fan
> >> >> >> 主题: New Version Notification for
> >> >> >>draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02.txt
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02.txt
> >> >> >> has been successfully submitted by Xiaohu Xu and posted to the
> >> >> >>IETF repository.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Filename:     draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet
> >> >> >> Revision:     02
> >> >> >> Title:                Virtual Subnet: A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension 
> >> >> >> Solution
> >> >> >> Creation date:        2013-11-25
> >> >> >> Group:                Individual Submission
> >> >> >> Number of pages: 13
> >> >> >> URL:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-0
> >> >>2.t
> >> >>xt
> >> >> >> Status:
> >> >> >>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet
> >> >> >> Htmlized:
> >> >> >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02
> >> >> >> Diff:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-0
> >> >> >>2
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Abstract:
> >> >> >>    This document describes a Layer3 Virtual Private Network
> >>(L3VPN)-
> >> >> >>    based subnet extension solution referred to as Virtual
> >> >> >> Subnet,
> >> >>which
> >> >> >>    can be used as a kind of Layer3 network virtualization overlay
> >> >> >>    approach for data center interconnect.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time
> >> >> >>of submission  until the htmlized version and diff are available
> >> >> >>at tools.ietf.org.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >

Reply via email to