I support the adoption of the draft as a WG document. As a co-author I am also unaware of any IPR.
Thanks Brendan On Feb 5, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Support (as co-author) > Null level of awareness of any IPR. > > r. > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Thomas Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until February 9th. > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > ==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. > > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > l3vpn chairs > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >
