Hi Thomas I guess the way I see it is that this is such a big limitation that I find it hard to imagine anyone deploying this solution.
is there any way we could get feedback from some data center operators? Perhaps we should ask NVO3 for comments? Giles On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:06, Thomas Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Giles, > > 2014-02-10, Giles Heron: >> The draft has a major limitation (no support for interconnecting >> routers, but only for interconnecting hosts) [...] > > That would indeed be an issue if the document was aiming standard track to > address a specific use case including router interconnections, or if the > limitation was not documented. But, the document is not aiming standard > track, and has a section to document limitations to which the working group > may contribute text for this particular limitation. > > >> >> sorry - just spotted the poll has already closed. > > The date had been mistakenly set 10 days too early. > The poll is not closed yet. > > -Thomas > > > >> On 4 Feb 2014, at 13:35, Thomas Morin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello working group, >>> >>> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >>> draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet [1] as a working group item. >>> >>> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption >>> or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >>> >>> This poll runs until February 9th. >>> >>> >>> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR >>> that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed >>> in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and >>> 5378 for more details). >>> >>> ==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please >>> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of >>> any relevant IPR. >>> >>> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received >>> from each author and contributor. >>> >>> If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an >>> author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you >>> are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance >>> with IETF rules. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Martin & Thomas l3vpn chairs >>> >>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >> >
