<changing subject to reflect more broader l3vpn related topic> Hi,
Could those who claim that that sending /32 or /64 or /128 in BGP mainly within contained DC zone environment will not scale be a bit more precise and kindly indicate what the real problem is ? * Which control or data plane element will not scale ? or * Which part of BGP state machine will not scale ? Just curious .... Cheers, R. > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Thomas Nadeau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas, > > I too object to it's adoption based on the /32 point Giles made. > > On Feb 10, 2014:2:29 PM, at 2:29 PM, Giles Heron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I don't support adoption of this draft as a WG item (speaking as a > non-author but name-checked commenter). > > > > The draft has a major limitation (no support for interconnecting > routers, but only for interconnecting hosts), and I'm unconvinced that > passing /32 host routes around in BGP will scale. >
