Hi Xiaohu, On 12 Feb 2014, at 01:45, Xuxiaohu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: Giles Heron [mailto:[email protected]] >> 发送时间: 2014年2月11日 19:32 >> 收件人: Thomas Morin >> 抄送: [email protected]; [email protected] >> 主题: Re: Poll for adoption: draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >> >> Hi Thomas >> >> I guess the way I see it is that this is such a big limitation that I find >> it hard to >> imagine anyone deploying this solution. > > Hi Giles, > > I suggest you google with the following keywords "Dynamic Fabric Automation > (DFA) host route" and have a look at how host routes are used in the DFA, and > then come back to confirm the above assertion. If you couldn't find it, feel > free to tell me and I will provide you a link. I'll leave it to those who know more about how DFA works than I do to comment. >> is there any way we could get feedback from some data center operators? >> Perhaps we should ask NVO3 for comments? > > I think the most efficient and simple way is to ask some feedback from your > colleagues who knows about DFA. sure. hopefully some of them read this list. Giles > Best regards, > Xiaohu > >> Giles >> >> On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:06, Thomas Morin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Giles, >>> >>> 2014-02-10, Giles Heron: >>>> The draft has a major limitation (no support for interconnecting >>>> routers, but only for interconnecting hosts) [...] >>> >>> That would indeed be an issue if the document was aiming standard track to >> address a specific use case including router interconnections, or if the >> limitation >> was not documented. But, the document is not aiming standard track, and has >> a section to document limitations to which the working group may contribute >> text for this particular limitation. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> sorry - just spotted the poll has already closed. >>> >>> The date had been mistakenly set 10 days too early. >>> The poll is not closed yet. >>> >>> -Thomas >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 4 Feb 2014, at 13:35, Thomas Morin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello working group, >>>>> >>>>> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >>>>> draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet [1] as a working group item. >>>>> >>>>> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption >>>>> or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >>>>> >>>>> This poll runs until February 9th. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >>>>> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >>>>> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and >>>>> 5378 for more details). >>>>> >>>>> ==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please >>>>> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of >>>>> any relevant IPR. >>>>> >>>>> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received >>>>> from each author and contributor. >>>>> >>>>> If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an >>>>> author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you >>>>> are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance >>>>> with IETF rules. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> >>>>> Martin & Thomas l3vpn chairs >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >>>> >>> >
