On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > Hi Neal, > > "Neal H. Walfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is one of the reasons why the kernel needs to provide some form > > of support for capabilities. > > That's an opportunity to resurrect an old thread... ;-) > > What do you think of Amoeba's relatively simple approach? > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2005-08/msg00014.html
I think anything protected by sparsity is fundamentally flawed and unacceptable, especially for something as critical as the kernel. Of course I'm not the one whose acceptance it needs, though. ;-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
