Hi, > Also, kernel object management is pretty important to me, if we want > at least orthogonal persistence.
"At least"?... Unless I'm missing something very crucial, unless I've completely misunderstood the way EROS works, I can confidently claim that orthogonal persistance is something we definitely do *not* want. It wouldn't help the goals of the Hurd at all. Actually, I'm pretty sure it would hinder them. I *do* believe we want some kind of session management (beyond passive translators) at some point. But I doubt this is something that should be implemented at kernel level; and I also doubt this is a thing that needs serious consideration at this stage. I've written up some of my thoughts on this at http://tri-ceps.blogspot.com/2005/09/persistance-vs-insistance.html -antrik- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
