On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 05:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > > Also, kernel object management is pretty important to me, if we want > > at least orthogonal persistence. > > "At least"?... > > Unless I'm missing something very crucial, unless I've completely > misunderstood the way EROS works, I can confidently claim that > orthogonal persistance is something we definitely do *not* want. It > wouldn't help the goals of the Hurd at all. Actually, I'm pretty sure it > would hinder them.
Umm. Well, anybody can claim anything they want... Your article raises some good questions, but you make some rather broad leaps to get to your conclusions, and I think that some of them are mistaken. However, it is 5am locally, so I will respond later. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
