I suggest that you see <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> if you have trouble taking things at face value. I'll quote it for you:
,---- | But not _adding_ those insecuritites, 90% of POSIX is damn good, and | has nothing to do with security, and is merly a API for writting | portable programs. The remaining 10% have to do with some bits of | security, uid's and file permissions. These bits can be _ignored_ and | something different implemented on instead. Just like not | implementing chroot(), and using something different that is secure. | | But you knew that and had to start a flame instead, and make absurd | claims that all of POSIX is inherently insecure, when in reality it | the majority of POSIX is totally irrelevant to implementing a secure | operating system. `---- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
