This is what Saint IGNUcius has to say about changing kernels.
X-Coding-System: iso-8859-15-unix
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by lgh163a.kemisten.nu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9R4EIDD030509
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:14:18 +0200 (CEST)
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:58:55 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:14:18 +0200
(CEST)
Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1EUyul-0007UC-CD; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:58:55 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: The Hurd and it's future
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:58:55 -0400
X-UIDL: `X^!!Ia5!!6Mp!!`2$"!
I might add that much of the reasons are based on thoughts to change
the kernel of Hurd on L4 to yet-another-kernel called EROS.
Who is in favor of that?
I am against it--to keep changing platforms means never getting it done.
_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
