I might add that much of the reasons are based on thoughts to change
the kernel of Hurd on L4 to yet-another-kernel called EROS.
Who is in favor of that?
I am against it--to keep changing platforms means never getting it done.
Looks very clear for me, Hurd need another kernel this is a fact. Its impossible improve in many aspects in the currently Mach microkernel. That means Hurd is not ready to use, he have a lot of problems and lack of speed at IPC. I have a lot of respect about RMS position, but I degree with that.
Thanks
Matheus Morais
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
