-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wei Mingzhi wrote: > At Sat 6 May, 2006 15:30 Pierre THIERRY writes: > >> DRM will not make it impossible to circumvent. DRM is about to give a >> sealed container and the key. It is only ``possible'' because it uses >> proprietary software, and there are solutions to break DRM. > > ...but breaking the DRM will be _illegal_ because of these laws. > > Not sure about the DADVSI but China also has a policy like this for software > (not for other materials though). And it says that merely "removing" any of > the "information used by Digital 'Rights' Management in software" will result > in civil penalty if this caused "losses" to the publisher. And DMCA can just > be more restrictive than this. >
China has laws like this? I thought they do not want DRM (because this would hand control away from the government)? - -- - -ness- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFEXZjRvD/ijq9JWhsRAiLpAKCAlS5LDbMUZ6jcrAzXFSVR1nJoAACY2m+G 4zViE83J7kkU/cnlEdcZ4w== =Tu8i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
