Hi, what can anyone do if he or she wants to help at the micro kernel thingie?
Spending time for the mach-kernel seems not very clever, if mach is going to be replaced. Regards, Martin On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:43:20 +0200 Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scribit Shams dies 14/04/2007 hora 14:38: > > I read somewhere that instead of L4, Hurd could be using L4.Sec as the > > microkernel? > > Both Coyotos and L4.sec could be used, it seems. > > > > rather an experimental/research subproject. > > Why another subproject, why not just develop/experiment with the > > existing Hurd? > > Because there are issues with the current Hurd that might not be > possible to solve while keeping Mach as the ยต-kernel, at least (IIUC, in > terms of security and performance). > > > Btw who calls the shots at which microkernel Hurd is going to be using > > and the development path for Hurd. > > Those who write the code. > > Quickly, > Pierre _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
