On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Martin Barth wrote: > Hi, > > what can anyone do if he or she wants to help at the micro kernel thingie? > > Spending time for the mach-kernel seems not very clever, if mach is going to > be replaced.
I strongly disagree. The idea of Hurd-NG was born *because* we tried with Mach. Improving the current Hurd is at least a way to find new problems and think of their solutions before trying something else. In addition, many other systems, like monolithic kernel based systems, have inherent flaws. That doesn't prevent them from being used and working in most cases. Why would it be different for the Hurd ? -- Richard Braun
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
