From Truthout:


      This Election Will Change the World. But Not in the Way the 
Americans Imagined
         By Robert Fisk
         The Independent U.K.

         Saturday 29 January 2005

         Shias are about to inherit Iraq, but the election tomorrow 
that will bring them to power is creating deep fears among the Arab 
kings and dictators of the Middle East that their Sunni leadership is 
under threat.

         America has insisted on these elections - which will produce 
a largely Shia parliament representing Iraq's largest religious 
community - because they are supposed to provide an exit strategy for 
embattled US forces, but they seem set to change the geopolitical map 
of the Arab world in ways the Americans could never have imagined. 
For George Bush and Tony Blair this is the law of unintended 
consequences writ large.

         Amid curfews, frontier closures and country-wide travel 
restrictions, voting in Iraq will begin tomorrow under the threat of 
Osama bin Laden's ruling that the poll represents an "apostasy". 
Voting started among expatriate Iraqis yesterday in Britain, the US, 
Sweden, Syria and other countries, but the turnout was much smaller 
than expected.

         The Americans have talked up the possibility of massive 
bloodshed tomorrow and US intelligence authorities have warned 
embassy staff in Baghdad that insurgents may have been "saving up" 
suicide bombers for mass attacks on polling stations.

         But outside Iraq, Arab leaders are talking of a Shia 
"Crescent" that will run from Iran through Iraq to Lebanon via Syria, 
whose Alawite leadership forms a branch of Shia Islam. The underdogs 
of the Middle East, repressed under the Ottomans, the British and 
then the pro-Western dictators of the region, will be a new and 
potent political force.

         While Shia political parties in Iraq have promised that they 
will not demand an Islamic republic - their speeches suggest that 
they have no desire to recreate the Iranian revolution in their 
country - their inevitable victory in an election that Iraq's Sunnis 
will largely boycott mean that this country will become the first 
Arab nation to be led by Shias.

         On the surface, this may not be apparent; Iyad Allawi, the 
former CIA agent and current Shia "interim" Prime Minister, is widely 
tipped as the only viable choice for the next prime minister - but 
the kings and emirs of the Gulf are facing the prospect with 
trepidation.

         In Bahrain, a Sunni monarchy rules over a Shia majority that 
staged a mini-insurrection in the 1990s. Saudi Arabia has long 
treated its Shia minority with suspicion and repression.

         In the Arab world, they say that God favoured the Shia with 
oil. Shias live above the richest oil reserves in Saudi Arabia and 
upon some of the Kuwaiti oil fields. Apart from Mosul, Iraqi Shias 
live almost exclusively amid their own country's massive oil fields. 
Iran's oil wealth is controlled by the country's overwhelming Shia 
majority.

         What does all this presage for the Sunni potentates of the 
Arabian peninsula? Iraq's new national assembly and the next interim 
government it selects will empower Shias throughout the region, 
inviting them to question why they too cannot be given a fair share 
of their country's decision-making.

         The Americans originally feared that parliamentary elections 
in Iraq would create a Shia Islamic republic and made inevitable - 
and unnecessary - warnings to Iran not to interfere in Iraq. But now 
they are far more frightened that without elections the 60 per cent 
Shia community would join the Sunni insurgency.

         Tomorrow's poll is thus, for the Americans, a means to an 
end, a way of claiming that - while Iraq may not have become the 
stable, liberal democracy they claimed they would create - it has 
started its journey on the way to Western-style freedom and that 
American forces can leave.

         Few in Iraq believe that these elections will end the 
insurgency, let alone bring peace and stability. By holding the poll 
now - when the Shias, who are not fighting the Americans, are voting 
while the Sunnis, who are fighting the Americans, are not - the 
elections can only sharpen the divisions between the country's two 
largest communities.

         While Washington had clearly not envisaged the results of its 
invasion in this way, its demand for "democracy" is now moving the 
tectonic plates of the Middle East in a new and uncertain direction. 
The Arab states outside the Shia "Crescent" fear Shia political power 
even more than they are frightened by genuine democracy.

         No wonder, then, King Abdullah of Jordan is warning that this 
could destabilise the Gulf and pose a "challenge" to the United 
States. This may also account for the tolerant attitude of Jordan 
towards the insurgency, many of whose leaders freely cross the border 
with Iraq.

         The American claim that they move secretly from Syria into 
Iraq appears largely false; the men who run the rebellion against US 
rule in Iraq are not likely to smuggle themselves across the 
Syrian-Iraqi desert when they can travel "legally" across the 
Jordanian border.

         Tomorrow's election may be bloody. It may well produce a 
parliament so top-heavy with Shia candidates that the Americans will 
be tempted to "top up" the Sunni assembly members by choosing some of 
their own, who will inevitably be accused of collaboration. But it 
will establish Shia power in Iraq - and in the wider Arab world - for 
the first time since the great split between Sunnis and Shias that 
followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad.

     

         Go to Original

         Iraqi President Says Most Iraqis Won't Vote
         Reuters

         Saturday 29 January 2005

         BAGHDAD - Iraq's president said on Saturday he expected 
violence to deter the majority of Iraqis from voting in Sunday's 
landmark election.

         "What we hope is that most Iraqis will take part in the 
election, but we know that the majority will not because of the 
security situation," President Ghazi al-Yawar told reporters.

         "The majority will decide not to take part, not because they 
are boycotting the election, but because of the security situation," 
said Yawar, a Sunni Muslim Arab.

         There has been a sharp increase in violence, including car 
bomb blasts, mortar attacks and shootings, this week as polling day 
approaches. The U.S. military said attacks on U.S. and Iraqi troops 
had trebled in the past seven days.

         Yawar's remarks contrasted with an appeal by interim Prime 
Minister Iyad Allawi for all Iraqis to defy violence and vote.

         "I ask them to participate in the elections whether they are 
inside or outside Iraq: Sunnis, Shi'ites, Kurds, Christians," Allawi 
told Sky television in Baghdad. An estimated 14 million Iraqis are 
eligible to vote on Sunday in Iraq's first multi-party election since 
the 1950s.

         Insurgent groups, particularly the organization headed by 
Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, have vowed to disrupt voting 
and stop people from going to polling centers.

         Around 6,000 polling centers have been set up around Iraq, 
but the location of many is being kept secret until the last minute 
to minimize the risk that they will be bombed.

         Turnout is expected to be low in Sunni Arab areas, where the 
insurgency gripping Iraq for nearly two years is focused. The 
government has said it hopes for a national turnout of around 50 
percent.

         Yawar, whose position is mainly ceremonial, also said any 
political process that did not include Sunnis, Kurds and Shi'ites, 
Iraq's three main religious and ethnic groups, would be invalid.

         Shi'ites, who make up about 60 percent of Iraq's population 
and were oppressed during Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s rule, 
are widely expected to dominate the polls.

     

         Go to Original

         Survey Finds Deep Divisions in Iraq
         Zogby International | Press Release

         Friday 28 January 2005

         Sunni Arabs overwhelmingly reject Sunday elections; majority 
of Sunnis, Shiites favor U.S. Withdrawal, New Abu Dhabi TV / Zogby 
poll reveals.

          Iraq's Sunday elections will be held against a backdrop of 
deep division between the country's ethnic groups, with an 
overwhelming majority of Sunni Arabs refusing to vote in the January 
30 elections, a new Abu Dhabi TV/Zogby International poll finds. The 
poll also finds majorities of both Iraq's Shiites and Sunnis calling 
for a rapid withdrawal of U.S. forces from their soil. Zogby 
International polled 805 Iraqi adults from January 19 to 23, 2005 on 
behalf of television broadcaster Abu Dhabi TV. The margin of error is 
+/- 3.6 percentage points.

         The survey, to be released at 5 p.m. ET on Abu Dhabi 
Television, found three-quarters (76%) of Sunni Arabs say they 
definitely will not vote in the January 30 elections, while just 9% 
say they are likely to vote. A majority of Shiites (80%) say they are 
likely to vote or definitely will vote, as are a smaller majority of 
Kurds (57%).

         Majorities of both Sunni Arabs (82%) and Shiites (69%) also 
favor U.S. forces withdrawing either immediately or after an elected 
government is in place.

         The poll also found that of Iraq's ethnic and religious 
groups, only the Kurds believe the U.S. will help Iraq over the next 
five years, while half (49%) of Shiites and a majority (64%) of Sunni 
Arabs believe the U.S. will hurt Iraq.

         There are deep divisions that exist, "divisions that are so 
deep and pronounced that this election, instead of bringing people 
together, may very well tear them apart," said Dr. James Zogby, an 
analyst for Zogby International and host of Abu Dhabi TV's 
"Viewpoint". The closest thing to this in America isn't red and blue 
states. It's probably the election of 1860.

         The poll also finds that, while a majority of Shiites (84%) 
and Kurds (64%) wish to hold the elections Sunday as planned, Sunni 
Arabs overwhelmingly favor delaying the vote (62%).

         What's truly alarming isn't the number of Sunni Arabs who 
want to delay Sunday's vote, Zogby said. What's alarming is that more 
than half, 53% in this survey, believe that ongoing attacks in Iraq 
are a legitimate form of resistance. With this group already 
boycotting the election, this makes for a very violent combination.

         Only the Kurds seem to favor a continued U.S. presence, and 
are likely to outright reject violent resistance, Zogby added.

         The survey also asked Iraqis which nations they believed it 
was possible to foster improved relations with. While a majority of 
Iraqis believe relations can be improved between Iraq and neighbors 
Kuwait, Turkey, and Iran, all ethnic and religious groups 
overwhelmingly rejected improving relations with the State of Israel.

         Iraqis do not desire to remake their country in the image of 
neighboring Iran, however. Three-in-five (59%) favor a system where 
citizens are allowed to practice their own religion, while 
one-in-three (34%) would prefer an Islamic government.

         The survey was conducted throughout Iraq, including the 
cities of Baghdad, Hilla, Karbala and Kirkuk, as well as the 
Mohafazat (provinces) of Diala and Anbar.

         Abu Dhabi TV/Zogby International conducted interviews of 805 
Iraqis. Field work dates were from 1/19/05 thru 1/23/05. The margin 
of error is +/- 3.6 percentage points. Slight weights were added to 
education, ethnicity, religion, gender to more accurately reflect the 
population. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups.
     [an error occurred while processing this directive]

     (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior 
interest in receiving the included information for research and 
educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever 
with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed 
or sponsored by the originator.)

       Print This Story  E-mail This Story





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Help save the life of a child.  Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's
'Thanks & Giving.'
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mGEjbB/5WnJAA/E2hLAA/7gSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to