96% of MoveOn Members Did Not Show Support for the Pelosi Bill
by John Stauber

On Sunday, March 18, Sheldon Rampton and I wrote     an article now 
widely circulated online. It has helped to focus debate on whether 
the Democratic Party is really attempting to end the war in Iraq, or 
is content to simply manage the war for supposed electoral advantage in 2008.

The liberal advocacy group 
<http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=MoveOn>MoveOn has 3.2 
million members. Yesterday MoveOn misleadingly claimed that the 
results from their recent member survey showed overwhelming support 
for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's bill on Iraq. "The results are in 
from our poll on whether to support Speaker Pelosi's proposal on 
Iraq: 84.6% of MoveOn members voted to support the bill," according 
to MoveOn. However, this claim flunks the smell test and is far far 
from accurate.

MoveOn is engaging that oldest of PR games known as 'lies, damned 
lies and statistics." The truth is that 96% of MoveOn's 3.2 million 
members did not even bother to vote in their member survey. Most of 
MoveOn's members probably ignored and failed to open the email, since 
nothing in the subject line indicated it was particularly important. 
MoveOn informed this reporter that about 126,000 people voted in what 
I pointed out to them was a very biased pro-Pelosi poll. The MoveOn 
question essentially provided a choice of Pelosi and peace (Yes), or 
Republicans and war (No). Gee, guess how that one gets answered?

The real news is that 96% of MoveOn's huge list did not vote with 
them to support the Pelosi bill. When MoveOn says 84.6% of their 
members chose Pelosi's bill, they mean 86.4% of the measly four 
percent of their members who bothered to open their email and 
respond. A polling of members in which 96% do not vote is no polling 
at all. Unfortunately MoveOn, while claiming to represent their 
overwhelmingly anti-war membership, is being unaccountable and 
anti-democratic.

An <http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0321-04.htm>article in 
Politico.com makes clear the crucial role MoveOn has played by 
supporting the Democratic leadership over the large caucus of 
pro-peace progressive Democrats. Here's a description of how the 
MoveOn survey was used inside the Capitol: "A jovial Rep. Dutch 
Ruppersberger went up to fellow Maryland Rep. Albert Wynn as he sat 
off the floor with a reporter and told Wynn that a vote against the 
bill was a vote for Republican victory. He waved a copy of the 
MoveOn.org press release backing the measure. 'Have you seen this?' 
Ruppersberger asked. 'Yeah, who did that?' replied Wynn, a member of 
the Out of Iraq Caucus."

The biased "poll" that MoveOn emaiied to its 3.2 million subscribers 
reads like a Soviet ballot. Many liberal strategists inside the 
Beltway believe that that what the House leadership is doing is smart 
and practical politics. In fact, this is back room power politics of 
the worst sort, a cynical 'Let It Bleed' strategy that abandons 
efforts to halt the war and is geared toward getting Democrats 
elected in 2008 by blaming the continuing quagmire of the Iraq 
occupation on the Republicans.

The American people deserve leadership and honesty from their 
political representatives and from groups that claim to be 
representing them. A choice between Republican or Democratic 
gamesmanship on Iraq is no choice at all when it allows the dying and 
suffering of tens of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands 
of Iraqis to go on, all for some campaign leverage down the road in 
2008. As confused as the American public has been by the Bush 
propaganda that sold the war, and the failure of the mainstream media 
to confront and expose it, there is now a solid majority of Americans 
who want the US out now or in the very immediate future. They are not 
being served by partisan gamesmanship, nor is their country.
John Stauber is Executive Director of the Center for Media and 
Democracy in Madison, Wisconsin. He can be reached at: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]


John Johnson
Change-Links Progressive Newspaper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://change-links.org
Subscribe to our list server. Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(818) 782-1412
Cell (818) 681-7448.

===




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to