Commentaries are sent to Sustainer Donors of Z/ZNet To learn more. consult ZNet at http://www.zmag.org
Today's commentary: http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-06/01fletcher.cfm ================================== ZNet Commentary The Posada Carrilles Case: Travesties on top of travesties June 01, 2007 By Bill Fletcher Each day in observing the Bush administration further implode I feel as if I am watching a sick comedy routine. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez gets caught fibbing as he explains the purge of Justice Department Attorneys; co-architect of the illegal Iraq invasion and occupation, and then World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz gets exposed in an unbelievable ethics violation, leading to his resignation; the Bush administration, in the cover of darkness, works to water down international declarations to address global warming despite significant evidence of it negative planetary impact...the list is almost endless. To add to this sick comedy, we now have the dismissal of immigration violation charges against notorious right-wing Cuban exile (and alleged terrorist) Luis Posada Carrilles by a Texas judge due to Bush administration bungling. Posada Carrilles, as you may know, has been suspected of involvement in (if not orchestrating) the bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner killing all passengers and crew. He has boasted of his involvement in the bombing of hotels in Cuba in which at least one civilian was killed, as his contribution toward a plan of wrecking the Cuban tourist industry. Brought up on charges centering on immigration violations rather than terrorism, Posada Carrilles seems to have a friend in the Bush administration; at least that is the way it looks given the manner in which the Administration approached this case. Contrast the Posada Carrilles case, for instance, with the very questionable case brought against alleged Muslim terrorists in Florida who supposedly plotted to attack the Sears Tower in Chicago. Caught in what can politely be called a sting operation, this hapless group was convicted in the media prior to any in depth investigation. The Bush administration held up this case to remind us of the alleged threat to our safety. What, one may ask, about the safety of Cuban civilians with Posada Carrilles walking free, Mr. Bush? Posada Carrilles is not the victim of a sting operation but rather of his own covert activity, sometimes at the direct service of US foreign objectives--such as in the Iran/Contra scandal--other times at the service of his own militaristic ambitions against the people of Cuba. In either case, he clearly fits the Bush administration?s stated definition of a terrorist yet the Bush administration is treating him more akin to the violator of a series of unpaid parking tickets rather than as a master criminal. More than anything else, the Posada Carrilles case demonstrates the disingenuous nature of the so-called war against terrorism. Yet it would be wrong to single out the Bush administration as the only perpetrator of such cynical activities. Whether it was the use by the US government of the UNITA guerrillas in Angola; of the Contras in Nicaragua; of the bi-partisan terrorist attacks against Cuba since 1959, the US government has repeatedly been fast and loose when it comes to holding a clear and internationally recognized standard in defining terrorists and terrorist activity. The handling of the Posada Carrilles case also stands in marked contrast to the case of the so-called "Cuban 5", imprisoned in the USA for their alleged work on behalf of the Cuban government in investigating and uncovering anti-Cuban terrorist plots here in the USA. Thus, when the Cuban government provided information to the USA regarding terrorist activity directed at Cuba, the US government used this to identify alleged Cuban agents and seek their speedy imprisonment. Nevertheless, Posada Carrilles walks virtually free. I wish that this were a comedy. Fiction could not be weirder. Reality, in this case, is both infuriating and deadly. ---------------------------------------------------- Bill Fletcher, Jr. is a labor and international activist and writer. He is the immediate past president of TransAfrica Forum and can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/05/1666/ Inter Press Service, June 5, 2007 Facing G8 Summit Failure, Germany Braces Itself by Julio Godoy HEILIGENDAMM, Germany - Facing the probability that this year's G8 summit will be a failure - mainly due to U.S. opposition to an international consensus on environmental, financial, and African cooperation issues - the German government, host of the event, is scaling down the expectations that it helped to stir in the first place. Only a couple of days before the summit starts at this resort on the Baltic Sea, Bernd Pfaffenbach, German deputy minister for economics, and the government's head planner of the Group of Eight summit, warned that hopes for the meet's outcomes had been too high. In an interview, Pfaffenbach referred specifically to the international environmental consensus proposed by the German government as one of the main items on the G8 summit's agenda, aimed at fighting global warming. "It is true that there is no common line in this issue (among G8 countries)," Pfaffenbach said. "But it is also true that the expectations were too high," he added, allegedly contrary to the efforts of the German government. "The Chancellor (Angela Merkel) did not want that this subject would receive that much attention," Pfaffenbach claimed. But the fact is the German government put the climate change issue high on the official agenda for the summit, which government officials like Pfaffenbach himself helped to formulate. The official German presentation of the summit says, "Great importance will be attributed to the subject of energy efficiency. New impetus for global climate protection and common international efforts after 2012 (post-Kyoto Protocol) will play an important role" during the summit. However, Germany prepared the summit without considering the stubborn opposition of the U.S. government. This is also true when t comes to German demands for more international controls over highly speculative hedge funds. Again, the U.S. government, this time with the British government, opposed the articulation of a clear G8 strategy towards a strict code of conduct for hedge funds. The aim of regulation is to reduce systemic risks in the financial markets that arise from highly speculative investments. The heads of government of the G8 (made up of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, and the United States) are meeting Jun. 6-8 in the German seaside resort of Heiligendamm, some 300 kilometres northwest of Berlin. Pfaffenbach admitted that "The U.S. and the British governments, under whose jurisdictions most of the hedge funds are based, showed some readiness to discuss the subject. But the summit of Heiligendamm won't be a success in this matter." As consequence, the joint declaration by the G8 ministers of finance, who met in Potsdam, near Berlin, on May 19, was a masterpiece of diplomatic ambiguity. "We continued our discussion on recent developments in global financial markets, including hedge funds, which, along with the emergence of advanced financial techniques and products, such as credit derivatives, have contributed significantly to the efficiency of the financial system," the joint declarations says. "Nevertheless," it adds, "the assessment of potential systemic and operational risks associated with these activities has become more complex and challenging. Given the strong growth of the hedge fund industry and the increasing complexity of the instruments they trade, we reaffirmed the need to be vigilant." No word appears of the "code of conduct" for hedge funds initially demanded by German finance minister Peter Steinbruck. Success appears also barred for the G8 summit on its cooperation programmes with Africa. According to German sources, U.S. representatives rejected a proposal inviting the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development to propose ways of complying with renewed aid promises for Africa. The German worries that the G8 summit would be seen as a fiasco, moved a group of close aides to Chancellor Merkel to design a new public relations strategy, aimed at channelling the public expectations of the summit towards what are considered popular issues. In a classified public relations strategy paper, formulated by this group of German government officials on May 20, Beate Bauman, Chancellor Merkel's bureau chief, is quoted as saying: "The German public opinion expects that the summit will be a success on environmental protection. She (Bauman) fears, that the summit will be seen as a failure if no convincing results (on this matter) can be reached." According to the paper, Chancellor Merkel wanted efforts made "to reduce during the coming weeks the expectations on environmental protection and energy efficiency." The paper also reveals that the German government would announce just before the summit that it would immediately increase its development aid to Africa 750 million euros (some 940 million U.S. dollars) per year, starting in 2008. This increase has been by now confirmed by several German ministers, including Pfaffenbach and the minister for international cooperation and development, Heidemarie Wieczorec Zeul. "By 2010, German aid for development will amount to 0.51 of the country's gross national product, as promised (at the G8 summit of Gleneagles, Scotland,) two years ago," Pfaffenbach said. The deputy minister also announced that Merkel had invited the head of the World Trade Organisation, Pascal Lamy, to attend the summit of Heiligendamm, "to report on the state of affairs on the negotiations to liberalise the international trade", for products from developing countries. "We're working towards the objective that the summit of Heiligendamm sends a clear signal to encourage further negotiations at the WTO", Pfaffenbach said. Market access in the industrialised world for agricultural products from Africa, Asia, and Latin America is seen as an essential tool in a long-term development strategy. The German government has also announced that it will increase unilaterally its use of renewable energy resources, to cover 30 percent of the total electricity output by the year 2020. In addition, Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel announced that Germany would reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases by 30 percent by 2020, instead of only 20 percent, as agreed with the European Union in April. But the German government has also made clear that it would not sign a bad compromise on reducing greenhouse gases, anything that would not tackle the causes of global warming. Pfaffenbach said, "We (the German government) won't accept an environmental compromise that does not respect that the United Nations be the framework of an international treaty starting 2012 (when the Kyoto Protocol expires), and that would try to water down scientific data on climate change." This rejection of any such a compromise is a demand made long ago by non-governmental organisations tracking the G8. In a joint declaration, the German federation of environmental organisations BUND, another environmental association, German Watch, and the ATTAC group, which advocates for the taxation of speculative financial transactions to finance development aid, demanded this week that the G8 answer the question, "whether they want to guarantee their privilege of continuing emitting greenhouse gases, responsible for global warming, or to show that they are ready for serious negotiations" at the UN climate talks in Bali, scheduled for December. Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
