And yet, none of the terrorists came from the USA (or Afghanistan or Iraq)...... the Bush WH Conspiracy Theory said, 9 of the 12 came from Saudi Arabia.
Napolitano has taken her "See Something, Say Something" campaign far beyond the traffic signs that ask drivers coming into the nation's capital for "Terror Tips" and to "Report Suspicious Activity." She recently enlisted the help of Wal-Mart, Amtrak, major sports leagues, hotel chains and metro riders. In her speeches, she compares the undertaking to the Cold War fight against communists. Yet others of us remember that this is the Nazi Germany WWII tactic of, turn in your neighbors and parents, to eliminate those who do not subscribe to your extremist views. Any Country that is afraid of the Population that is is suppose to govern for the benefit of, is no Longer a government of the People, by the People, or for the People. Scott On 12/20/2010 5:58 PM, Michael Novick wrote: > > From: <<mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:a.beltran%40ymail.com>>[email protected] > <mailto:a.beltran%40ymail.com>> > Date: Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:12 PM > Subject: Monitoring America - US assembling vast domestic > intelligence apparatus to collect information about Americans > > <http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/monitoring-america/print/>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/monitoring-america/print/ > > Monitoring America > > Monday, December 20, 2010; 1:40 AM > > Nine years after the terrorist attacks of 2001, the United States is > assembling a vast domestic intelligence apparatus to collect > information about Americans, using the FBI, local police, state > homeland security offices and military criminal investigators. > > The system, by far the largest and most technologically sophisticated > in the nation's history, collects, stores and analyzes information > about thousands of U.S. citizens and residents, many of whom have not > been accused of any wrongdoing. > > The government's goal is to have every state and local law > enforcement agency in the country feed information to Washington to > buttress the work of the FBI, which is in charge of terrorism > investigations in the United States. > > Other democracies - Britain and Israel, to name two - are well > acquainted with such domestic security measures. > > But for the United States, the sum of these new activities represents > a new level of governmental scrutiny. > > This localized intelligence apparatus is part of a larger Top Secret > America created since the attacks. > > In July, The Washington Post described an alternative geography of > the United States, one that has grown so large, unwieldy and > secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people > it employs or how many programs exist within it. > > Today's story, along with related material on The Post's Web site, > examines how Top Secret America plays out at the local level. > > It describes a web of 4,058 federal, state and local organizations, > each with its own counterterrorism responsibilities and jurisdictions. > > At least 935 of these organizations have been created since the 2001 > attacks or became involved in counterterrorism for the first time > after 9/11. > > The months-long investigation, based on nearly 100 interviews and > 1,000 documents, found that: > > * Technologies and techniques honed for use on the battlefields of > Iraq and Afghanistan have migrated into the hands of law enforcement > agencies in America. > > * The FBI is building a database with the names and certain personal > information, such as employment history, of thousands of U.S. > citizens and residents whom a local police officer or a fellow > citizen believed to be acting suspiciously. > > It is accessible to an increasing number of local law enforcement and > military criminal investigators, increasing concerns that it could > somehow end up in the public domain. > > * Seeking to learn more about Islam and terrorism, some law > enforcement agencies have hired as trainers self-described experts > whose extremist views on Islam and terrorism are considered > inaccurate and counterproductive by the FBI and U.S. intelligence > agencies. > > * The Department of Homeland Security sends its state and local > partners intelligence reports with little meaningful guidance, and > state reports have sometimes inappropriately reported on lawful > meetings.The need to identify U.S.-born or naturalized citizens who > are planning violent attacks is more urgent than ever, U.S. > intelligence officials say. This month's FBI sting operation > involving a Baltimore construction worker who allegedly planned to > bomb a Maryland military recruiting station is the latest example. It > followed a similar arrest of a Somali-born naturalized U.S. citizen > allegedly seeking to detonate a bomb near a Christmas tree lighting > ceremony in Portland, Ore. There have been nearly two dozen other > cases just this year. > > "The old view that 'if we fight the terrorists abroad, we won't have > to fight them here' is just that - the old view," Homeland Security > Secretary Janet Napolitano told police and firefighters recently. > > The Obama administration heralds this local approach as a much-needed > evolution in the way the country confronts terrorism..However, just > as at the federal level, the effectiveness of these programs, as well > as their cost, is difficult to determine. > > The Department of Homeland Security, for example, does not know how > much money it spends each year on what are known as state fusion > centers, which bring together and analyze information from various > agencies within a state. > > The total cost of the localized system is also hard to gauge. The DHS > has given $31 billion in grants since 2003 to state and local > governments for homeland security and to improve their ability to > find and protect against terrorists, including $3.8 billion in 2010. > > At least four other federal departments also contribute to local efforts. > > But the bulk of the spending every year comes from state and local > budgets that are too disparately recorded to aggregate into an overall > total. > > The Post findings paint a picture of a country at a crossroads, where > long-standing privacy principles are under challenge by these new > efforts to keep the nation safe. > > The public face of this pivotal effort is Napolitano, the former > governor of Arizona, which years ago built one of the strongest state > intelligence organizations outside of New York to try to stop illegal > immigration and drug importation. > > Napolitano has taken her "See Something, Say Something" campaign far > beyond the traffic signs that ask drivers coming into the nation's > capital for "Terror Tips" and to "Report Suspicious Activity." > > She recently enlisted the help of Wal-Mart, Amtrak, major sports > leagues, hotel chains and metro riders. > > In her speeches, she compares the undertaking to the Cold War fight > against communists. > > "This represents a shift for our country," she told New York City > police officers and firefighters on the eve of the 9/11 anniversary > this fall. "In a sense, this harkens back to when we drew on the > tradition of civil defense and preparedness that predated today's > concerns."---- > > >From Afghanistan to Tennessee > > On a recent night in Memphis, a patrol car rolled slowly through a > parking lot in a run-down section of town. > > The military-grade infrared camera on its hood moved robotically from > left to right, snapping digital images of one license plate after > another and analyzing each almost instantly. > > Suddenly, a red light flashed on the car's screen along with the word > "warrant." > > "Got a live one! Let's do it," an officer called out. > > The streets of Memphis are a world away from the streets of Kabul, > yet these days, the same types of technologies and techniques are > being used in both places to identify and collect information about > suspected criminals and terrorists. > > The examples go far beyond Memphis. > > * Hand-held, wireless fingerprint scanners were carried by U.S. > troops during the insurgency in Iraq to register residents of entire > neighborhoods. > > L-1 Identity Solutions is selling the same type of equipment to > police departments to check motorists' identities. > > * In Arizona, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Facial Recognition Unit, > using a type of equipment prevalent in war zones, records 9,000 > biometric digital mug shots a month. > > * U.S. Customs and Border Protection flies General Atomics' Predator > drones along the Mexican and Canadian borders - the same kind of > aircraft, equipped with real-time, full-motion video cameras, that > has been used in wars in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan to track the enemy. > > The special operations units deployed overseas to kill the al-Qaeda > leadership drove technological advances that are now expanding in use > across the United States. > > On the front lines, those advances allowed the rapid fusing of > biometric identification, captured computer records and cellphone > numbers so troops could launch the next surprise raid. > > Here at home, it's the DHS that is enamored with collecting photos, > video images and other personal information about U.S. residents in > the hopes of teasing out terrorists. > > The DHS helped Memphis buy surveillance cameras that monitor > residents near high-crime housing projects, problematic street > corners, and bridges and other critical infrastructure. > > It helped pay for license plate readers and defrayed some of the cost > of setting up Memphis's crime-analysis center. > > All together it has given Memphis $11 million since 2003 in homeland > security grants, most of which the city has used to fight crime. > > "We have got things now we didn't have before," said Memphis Police > Department Director Larry Godwin, who has produced record numbers of > arrests using all this new analysis and technology. > > "Some of them we can talk about. Some of them we can't." > > One of the biggest advocates of Memphis's data revolution is John > Harvey, the police department's technology specialist, whose computer > systems are the civilian equivalent of the fancier special ops > equipment used by the military. > > Harvey collects any information he can pry out of government and > industry. When officers were wasting time knocking on the wrong doors > to serve warrants, he persuaded the local utility company to give him > a daily update of the names and addresses of customers. > > When he wanted more information about phones captured at crime > scenes, he programmed a way to store all emergency 911 calls, which > often include names and addresses to associate with phone numbers. > > He created another program to upload new crime reports every five > minutes and mine them for the phone numbers of victims, suspects, > witnesses and anyone else listed on them. > > Now, instead of having to decide which license plate numbers to type > into a computer console in the patrol car, an officer can simply > drive around, and the automatic license plate reader on his hood > captures the numbers on every vehicle nearby. > > If the officer pulls over a driver, instead of having to wait 20 > minutes for someone back at the office to manually check records, he > can use a hand-held device to instantly call up a mug shot, a Social > Security number, the status of the driver's license and any > outstanding warrants. > > The computer in the cruiser can tell an officer even more about who > owns the vehicle, the owner's name and address and criminal history, > and who else with a criminal history might live at the same address. > > Take a recent case of two officers with the hood-mounted camera > equipment who stopped a man driving on a suspended license. > > One handcuffed him, and the other checked his own PDA. > > Based on the information that came up, the man was ordered downtown > to pay a fine and released as the officers drove off to stop another car. > > That wasn't the end of it, though. > > A record of that stop - and the details of every other arrest made > that night, and every summons written - was automatically transferred > to the Memphis Real Time Crime Center, a command center with three > walls of streaming surveillance video and analysis capabilities that > rival those of an Army command center. > > There, the information would be geocoded on a map to produce a visual > rendering of crime patterns. > > This information would help the crime intelligence analysts predict > trends so the department could figure out what neighborhoods to swarm > with officers and surveillance cameras. > > But that was still not the end of it, because the fingerprints from > the crime records would also go to the FBI's data campus in > Clarksburg, W.Va. > > There, fingerprints from across the United States are stored, along > with others collected by American authorities from prisoners in Saudi > Arabia and Yemen, Iraq and Afghanistan. > > There are 96 million sets of fingerprints in Clarksburg, a volume > that government officials view not as daunting but as an opportunity. > > This year for the first time, the FBI, the DHS and the Defense > Department are able to search each other's fingerprint databases, > said Myra Gray, head of the Defense Department's Biometrics Identity > Management Agency, speaking to an industry group recently. > > "Hopefully in the not-too-distant future," she said, "our > relationship with these federal agencies - along with state and local > agencies - will be completely symbiotic." > > ----The FBI's 'suspicious' files > > At the same time that the FBI is expanding its West Virginia > database, it is building a vast repository controlled by people who > work in a top-secret vault on the fourth floor of the J. Edgar Hoover > FBI Building in Washington. > > This one stores the profiles of tens of thousands of Americans and > legal residents who are not accused of any crime. > > What they have done is appear to be acting suspiciously to a town > sheriff, a traffic cop or even a neighbor. > > If the new Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative, or > SAR, works as intended, the Guardian database may someday hold files > forwarded by all police departments across the country in America's > continuing search for terrorists within its borders. > > The effectiveness of this database depends, in fact, on collecting > the identities of people who are not known criminals or terrorists - > and on being able to quickly compile in-depth profiles of them. > > "If we want to get to the point where we connect the dots, the dots > have to be there," said Richard A. McFeely, special agent in charge > of the FBI's Baltimore office. > > In response to concerns that information in the database could be > improperly used or released, FBI officials say anyone with access has > been trained in privacy rules and the penalties for breaking them. > > But not everyone is convinced. > > "It opens a door for all kinds of abuses," said Michael German, a > former FBI agent who now leads the American Civil Liberties Union's > campaign on national security and privacy matters. > > "How do we know there are enough controls?" > > The government defines a suspicious activity as "observed behavior > reasonably indicative of pre-operational planning related to > terrorism or other criminal activity" related to terrorism. > > State intelligence analysts and FBI investigators use the reports to > determine whether a person is buying fertilizer to make a bomb or to > plant tomatoes; whether she is plotting to poison a city's drinking > water or studying for a metallurgy test; whether, as happened on a > Sunday morning in late September, the man snapping a picture of a > ferry in the Newport Beach harbor in Southern California simply liked > the way it looked or was plotting to blow it up. > > Suspicious Activity Report N03821 says a local law enforcement > officer observed "a suspicious subject . . . taking photographs of > the Orange County Sheriff Department Fire Boat and the Balboa Ferry > with a cellular phone camera." > > The confidential report, marked "For Official Use Only," noted that > the subject next made a phone call, walked to his car and returned > five minutes later to take more pictures. > > He was then met by another person, both of whom stood and "observed > the boat traffic in the harbor." > > Next another adult with two small children joined them, and then they > all boarded the ferry and crossed the channel.All of this information > was forwarded to the Los Angeles fusion center for further > investigation after the local officer ran information about the > vehicle and its owner through several crime databases and found > nothing.Authorities would not say what happened to it from there, but > there are several paths a suspicious activity report can take:At the > fusion center, an officer would decide to either dismiss the > suspicious activity as harmless or forward the report to the nearest > FBI terrorism unit for further investigation.At that unit, it would > immediately be entered into the Guardian database, at which point one > of three things could happen:The FBI could collect more information, > find no connection to terrorism and mark the file closed, though > leaving it in the database.It could find a possible connection and > turn it into a full-fledged case.Or, as most often happens, it could > make no specific determination, which would mean that Suspicious > Activity Report N03821 would sit in limbo for as long as five years, > during which time many other pieces of information about the man > photographing a boat on a Sunday morning could be added to his file: > employment, financial and residential histories; multiple phone > numbers; audio files; video from the dashboard-mounted camera in the > police cruiser at the harbor where he took pictures; and anything > else in government or commercial databases "that adds value," as the > FBI agent in charge of the database described it.That could soon > include biometric data, if it existed; the FBI is working on a way to > attach such information to files... > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
