Navajo Group to Take Uranium Mine Challenge to Human Rights Commission
    By APRIL REESE of Greenwire

Tomorrow, Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining, with the help of 
the New Mexico Environmental Law Center, will submit a petition to the 
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights arguing that the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission's decision to grant Hydro Resources Inc., a 
license to mine uranium ore near Churchrock and Crown Point, N.M., is a 
violation of international laws.        
The groups contend the mines, first permitted by NRC in 1999, could 
contaminate drinking water for 15,000 Navajo residents in and around the
 two communities, which lie just outside the Navajo Nation. In 2005, the
 Navajo's tribal government passed a law prohibiting uranium mining 
within its borders.        
"By its acts and omissions that have contaminated and will continue to 
contaminate natural resources in the Dine communities of Crownpoint and 
Church Rock, the State has violated Petitioners' human rights and 
breached its obligations under the American Declaration of the Rights 
and Duties of Man," the petition reads.        
"We're very hopeful," said Eric Jantz, an attorney with the New Mexico 
Environmental Law Center who is filing the petition on behalf of ENDAUM.
 "I think we have very solid claims. It's always been our client's 
position that clean water is a human right."        
The United Nations also recognizes clean water as a human right, he added.      
  
The groups cannot take their case to the Inter-American Court of Human 
Rights, which is separate from the commission, because the United States
 does not recognize the international court's jurisdiction, Jantz said. 
       
ENDAUM and the law center are hoping the commission will put pressure on
 the NRC and State Department to reverse the licensing decision.        
The Navajo Nation is still suffering the aftermath of previous uranium 
mining, which left hundreds of abandoned mines and myriad health 
problems for Navajo people, including high rates of cancer, heart 
disease and birth defects.        
Former Navajo mine workers who removed uranium ore during the 1950s and 
'60s to feed the buildup of the nation's Cold War nuclear arsenal 
continue to seek workers' compensation and health care assistance. Just 
last month, Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) reintroduced the "Radiation Exposure
 Compensation Act," which would allow more of those former workers to 
receive restitution.        
"Residents already have to live with radiation and heavy metals," Jantz 
said. The cleanup of abandoned mines from the last uranium boom is still
 in progress. Most recently, Canadian firm Rio Algom Mining agreed to a 
$2.5 million cleanup of two uranium-contaminated sites on the Navajo and
 Hopi reservations in New Mexico and Arizona.        
Raising case's profile        
In addition to compelling NRC to reconsider the license for the new 
mines, the groups hope to raise the profile of their case 
internationally and drive home the point that uranium mining is a human 
rights issue as well as an environmental one, Jantz added.        
Officials with NRC declined to comment on the petition, saying they had 
not seen the document. They also refused to comment on the groups' 
decision to challenge the license in an international forum.        
Mat Lueras, vice president of corporate development for Uranium 
Resources Inc., Hydro Resources' parent firm, said the company had not 
heard about the petition and also declined comment. URI hopes to open 
the first New Mexico mine in 2013, according to company officials.      
  
Last March, a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of 
Appeals in Denver ruled that NRC had adequately considered the potential
 effects of the project in its analysis and included adequate 
environmental safeguards (Land Letter, Sept. 23, 2010).        
But critics of NRC's licensing of Hydro Resources' New Mexico mines 
argued the agency should have evaluated radiation emissions from 
existing waste piles in the area, including tailings left from past 
uranium mining dating back decades. They also argue that NRC failed to 
require sufficient protections for groundwater from the new mines.      
  
The groups appealed the case to the Supreme Court, but in November the 
justices decided not to review the lower court's decision. Hydro 
Resources announced a few days later that it would move forward with the
 project. On its web site, URI refers to its uranium holdings in New 
Mexico as its largest asset.        
The company plans to use an in-situ type of uranium extraction it says 
has several advantages over traditional mining. For example, in-situ 
recovery leaves uranium ore in the ground and extracts minerals by 
dissolving the ore and pumping the solution to the surface.        
The process, now widely used by uranium mining firms, generates no 
tailings, but operations should be located "so that they do not 
contaminate ground water away from the ore body," according to the World
 Nuclear Association (Land Letter, April 24, 2008).        
Groundwater concerns        
An environmental impact statement for the project acknowledged that no 
similar operation has fully restored groundwater quality to pre-mining 
conditions. But URI has received a designation from U.S. EPA that 
prohibits the aquifer from being used as a drinking water source. That 
means the company will have to treat the water to meet health and safety
 standards for livestock or irrigation use, but not for human 
consumption.        
Furthermore, radiation levels in the air will not be affected because 
the company will use "down flow columns" to send radiation back 
underground, according to company officials.        
The company still must renew its outdated underground injection control 
permit, which will be handled by the New Mexico Environment Department. 
       
Jantz said that if the company cannot restore groundwater to drinking 
water standards, the project should not be allowed to proceed. "When the
 company says they'll restore groundwater, what that means is they'll 
make a run at restoring it, but they can't fully restore it, so they get
 a variance from the regulatory agencies," he said. "It's just on paper 
-- it's a legal fiction."        
Uranium prices, which plunged briefly after the Japan nuclear crisis but
 have rebounded to around $68 for long-term contracts and about $56 on 
the spot market, have risen in recent years as interest in nuclear power
 development has grown as an alternative to greenhouse gas-emitting 
energy sources like coal.        
While the failures at Japan's Fukushima plant following the March 11 
earthquake and tsunami have focused international attention on the 
potential perils of nuclear energy, Jantz said the petition was in the 
works even before the disaster in Japan.        
"We actually decided to this long before Fukushima," Jantz said. "Our 
clients have always been cognizant of the fact there are communities all
 around the world that have suffered at the hands of the nuclear 
industry."        
Most of the uranium mining projects in New Mexico are being financed by 
Japanese and other Asian investors, as well as some in Russia, he said. 
       
Reese writes from Santa Fe, N.M.        
Copyright 2011 E&E Publishing. All Rights Reserved. 

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/05/12/12greenwire-navajo-group-to-take-uranium-mine-challenge-to-33718.html?pagewanted=all


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to