http://images.alternet.org/images/managed/storyimages_1339688976_screenshot2
0120614at11.42.07am.png_640x1054_310x220

AlterNet

Campaign and New Law Challenge Chic Israeli Company Ahava Cosmetics, Whose
"Dead Sea Mud" Illegally Exploits Palestinians

By Anna Lekas Miller, AlterNet
Posted on June 16, 2012, Printed on June 23, 2012
http://www.alternet.org/story/155873/campaign_and_new_law_challenge_chic_isr
aeli_company_ahava_cosmetics%2C_whose_%22dead_sea_mud%22_illegally_exploits_
palestinians

Ahava means love in Hebrew. But the Israeli corporation bearing that name
engages in practices that are far from loving.

The multinational corporation Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories-a cosmetics
company specializing in products that evoke the Israeli natural landscape-is
notorious for illegally exploiting Palestinian land and natural resources to
make its products. With names like Natural Dead Sea Body Mud, these products
are packaged as being "Made in Israel" and shipped to be sold in cosmetics
stores around the world.

But these products are not made in Israel; they are made in the occupied
West Bank in Palestine. Labeling these products as Israeli-made is not only
misleading, it's fraudulent and violates international trade regulations. In
order to bring transparency to where Ahava and other companies make
products, the governments of South Africa and Denmark have recently decided
to implement new regulations requiring settlement-produced goods to be
labeled as settlement-made, rather than made in Israel. The government
decisions have been a boon to the movement to boycott Israeli settlements.

Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories will be one of the companies most affected by
the change in labeling practices.

Ahava's main factory, and its visitors' center, is located in Miztpe Shalem,
an Israeli settlement in the occupied part of the Jordan Valley in the West
Bank, along the northern bank of the Dead Sea. Despite its vast territory
and the richness and fertility of the land, only 2.6 percent of the
Palestinian population currently lives in the Jordan Valley. Most of the
Jordan Valley's Palestinian residents were expelled by the Israeli army
during the 1967 war. Since the war, which resulted in Israeli control of the
West Bank, 37 Jewish-only settlements have been established in the Jordan
Valley, creating a network of roads and checkpoints that connect and
facilitate travel between settler communities while severely complicating
life for the remaining Palestinians.

Though Ahava Dead Sea products are made with Palestinian resources on
Palestinian land, neither the Palestinian economy nor the Palestinians
profit from any of these sales. In fact, the Palestinian economy loses $144
million per year from Israel's exploitation of the Dead Sea alone.  

Exploiting the natural resources of an occupied territory is expressly
prohibited under international law. Yet at the end of last year, the Israeli
High Court of Justice ruled that Israeli companies had the right to exploit
West Bank resources.

Israeli settlements are also illegal under international law.

Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories is not only located and operating in one of
these settlements, but also co-owned by two settlements-Mitzpe Shalem, the
settlement in which the factory is located, and Kalia, the settlement from
which the mud is extracted. The profits from Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories
sales subsidize these settlements, robbing Palestinians of natural resources
that are rightfully theirs and supporting illegal practices of colonialism
that are pushing them out of the land they have inhabited for centuries.

Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories products quite literally bottle the spirit of
the occupation: claiming and mining Palestinian land and then repackaging it
and marketing it to the world as Israeli.

But these deceptive practices have not gone unnoticed.

In 2009, the antiwar activist group CodePink launched the "Stolen Beauty"
campaign, specifically targeting Ahava's products as part of the larger
boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign. The nonviolent BDS
movement advocates boycotts of Israeli products, divestment from companies
involved in Israel and sanctions against the state until it complies with
international law in its relations with the Palestinians.

Though CodePink supports the BDS movement as a whole, the Stolen Beauty
campaign aims to draw attention to and boycott specific Israeli policies
such as illegal resource exploitation and settlement building, rather than
the often-criticized boycott of Israel as a whole.

"When you boycott Ahava, you are saying boycott these products because the
company's practices are against international and humanitarian law," Nancy
Kricorian, founder of the Stolen Beauty campaign, told AlterNet.

For the past three years, the campaign has targeted several merchants, from
Ahava storefronts and big chain department stores to small mom and pop
retailers, pressuring them to discontinue their relationships with Ahava.
Many of these campaigns have been successful in voicing ethical and economic
concerns, and in some cases have won bigger victories. Due to the
persistence of weekly protests, Ahava no longer has its flagship storefront
in Central London.

However, its most significant victory came with the news that the
governments of South Africa and Denmark would no longer label imports from
Israeli settlements as "Made in Israel."

"The government of South Africa recognizes the state of Israel only within
the borders demarcated by the United Nations in 1948," reads the notice from
South Africa's Department of Trade, adding that this does not include the
currently occupied Palestinian territories.

Denmark, and Migros, one of the largest and most popular supermarket chains
in Switzerland, have gone further. They have proposed labeling goods as,
"Product of the West Bank Israeli Settlement Zone" and "Product of East
Jerusalem, Israeli Settlement Zone" as more factually accurate labels.
Israeli companies are more than welcome to continue trading with these
countries-they will simply have to bear the consequences of losing customers
due to the political implications of their corporate practices.

"Under these proposed labeling rules, no one is expressly calling for
boycotting Israeli goods or even settlement goods, but consumers will now
have an informed choice about whether or not they wish to support the
political conditions under which these goods were produced," Kricorian said.

The BDS movement, which follows a call from Palestinian civil society, began
in 2005 and is intended to last until Israel complies with international law
and respects Palestinian human rights. It has expanded into a global
movement targeting corporate facilitators of the Israeli occupation, and
many have been financially affected by organized boycotts.

"More and more corporations are leaving the settlements," said Dalit Baum,
cofounder of Who Profits, an anti-occupation Israeli group affiliated with
the Coalition of Women for Peace. "It is becoming increasingly more and more
difficult to do business in Europe with that affiliation largely because of
BDS."

The hope is that as publicity of the movement increases, and more people are
educated on the humanitarian atrocities of several corporations, companies
will be forced to evaluate their business practices. And as more
transparency campaigns educate consumers on what exactly these business
practices entail, more consumers could choose other products, economically
chipping away at the Israeli occupation.

It is not a quick process, though. In South Africa, the call from the
African National Congress of South Africa (ANC) to boycott, divestment and
sanction the apartheid regime was released in 1959. Apartheid finally ended
in 1994.

In seven years, the BDS movement against Israel has divested significant
amounts of money from corporate giants such as Veolia and Caterpillar and
used several consumer products to educate people about the policies and
practices of the Israeli occupation.

Ahava has been put on the defensive in just three years of an organized
boycott campaign. What could the larger BDS movement do with some more time?


C 2012 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/155873/


_______________________________________
No infections found in this outgoing message
Scanned by iolo System Shield®
http://www.iolo.com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to