- *The Miami
Herald*<http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/28/2873422/venezuela-to-join-in-oil-exploration.html#morer>
   * reports that Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, Petroleos de
   Venezuela SA, has announced that it will conduct off shore drilling in
   Cuban waters.*
   - ----------------------

Venezuelan Opposition TV Channel Globovision to Pay Overdue Fine

Jun 29th 2012, by Ewan Robertson
[image: Globovision newsroom (Carlos Mesa/ UN).]

Globovision newsroom (Carlos Mesa/ UN).

Edinburgh, 29 June 2012 (Venezuelanalysis.com) – Opposition television
channel Globovision has said it will pay a fine of US $2.2 million (9.3
million bolivars) today, eight months after it was first issued by
Venezuela’s National Telecommunications Commission (Conatel).

Globovision announced yesterday it would pay the fine after Venezuela’s
Supreme Court ordered an embargo on US $5.7 million (Bs 24.4 million) of
Globovision’s assets to force compliance with the fine’s payment. The
embargo order also requested that Venezuela’s Central Bank calculate the
interest due on the fine, which should have been paid by 1 January this
year.

State regulator Conatel issued the fine in October last year after deeming
that Globovision had broken articles 27 and 29 of the Law of Social
Responsibility in Radio and Television during its coverage of the El Rodeo
prison hostage situation in June 2011.

According to Conatel, Globovision had deliberately attempted to manipulate
information and create a situation of uncertainty and anxiety in Venezuela
by replaying interviews of distraught prisoners’ mothers 269 times over
four days and adding the sound of gunfire to reports.

Globovision went to the Supreme Court to appeal the fine, however the
appeal was denied on 15 March. Conatel then went to the Supreme Court to
demand that payment of the fine be enforced, with Conatel director Pedro
Maldonado arguing that as Globovision had not “shown interest” in paying
the penalty, legal action was necessary.

In response to yesterday’s Supreme Court embargo order, Globovision
released a press statement complaining it was being “forced” to pay the
fine, with the station’s lawyer Ricardo Antela stating “if this embargo was
applied it would mean the definitive closure of the channel”.

The channel had previously claimed that the original fine, equivalent to
7.5% of Globovision’s gross earnings in 2010, represented the “economic
bankruptcy” of the station. Other groups, such as NGO Journalists for
Truth, argued that in light of annual earnings of US $30.2 million (Bs130
million) the station was not in danger of bankruptcy.

After paying the Conatel fine today Globovision representatives will
immediately request the embargo order against its assets be dropped.

*An independent decision*

Globovision’s press statement charged the Supreme Court’s embargo order as
“grotesque and despotic”, arguing that the original fine was unjustified
and that legal channels of appeal had still not been exhausted, with
proceedings ongoing in the Administrative Dispute Court.

The Administrative Dispute Court had already denied a Globovision appeal to
suspend the Conatel fine, which was then passed onto the Supreme Court
where it was also quashed.

The right-wing channel also claimed public authorities were seeking
“communicational hegemony” ahead of the presidential elections later this
year, with the station’s vice president, Maria Fernanda Flores, declaring
that the Supreme Court’s decision was “a new blow against freedom of
expression and a way to intimidate” Globovision.

The government’s information minister Andres Izarra also commented on the
matter, stating that “the Supreme Court made an independent decision. The
[national] executive has nothing to do with today’s decision by the TSJ”.

He further declared to press that “the state of law rules” in Venezuela,
and that Globovision was first able to go to the Supreme Court to appeal
the fine but it was turned down.

Globovision was previously fined US $3 million by the government in June
2009, for tax evasion and using unauthorised airwaves.

The opposition channel also manipulated information and participated in the
short lived coup against current president Hugo Chavez in April 2002.
 ------------------------------
*Source URL (retrieved on 29/06/2012 - 8:02pm):*
http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/7082
----------------------------

* (Photo Gallery) March of community media and popular communication
alternative claims for revolution and socialism *
*article also in Spanish:*
**
*great photos- 
**http://www.aporrea.org/medios/n208525.html*<http://www.aporrea.org/medios/n208525.html>

 Celebrating the Alternative Media Movement in Venezuela

Jun 28th 2012, by Luis Rivero Donalle – Ciudad CCS
[image: Part of yesterday&#039;s alternative media march in Caracas
(Aporrea)]

Part of yesterday's alternative media march in Caracas (Aporrea)

Today we celebrate the national day of journalists in Venezuela. Because of
this day, it’s worth remembering a phrase that was written in the streets
of Argentina during the December 2001 crisis: “They piss on us and the
press says it’s raining”. This aphorism captions the situation of the
social media today.  Readers are reading, listening, or watching the
information they receive more and more carefully.

However, the people of Venezuela have gone beyond that. Thanks to legal,
technological, technical, and educational support from the government of
the president, Hugo Chavez, and because of the determination of citizens
after 2000, a national system of community and alternative media started to
be born. It’s a system which, even though it has a long way to go, is a
symbol of collective organisation and the satisfying of everybody’s right
to communicate.

So, today from 10am, alternative and community media will march from
Venezuela Plaza to Llaguno bridge in support of collective organisation,
grassroots communication, president Chavez’s project, and against media
manipulation.

*Vindicating the people’s struggles*

The director of alternative and community media with the communications
ministry, Reinaldo Escorcia, explained that “popular (grassroots)
communication, a name we give to the non-profit community and alternative
media, is what is happening in the hearts of the communities to promote
social organisation and historical and cultural heritage in the geographic
space where it’s being developed”.

The civil servant said that this type of communication aims to vindicate
the struggles of the people and strengthen popular power. “A fundamental
characteristic of this media is that they have a direct relationship with
the people. Further, they promote the creation of the content with the
listeners through regular community assemblies,” he said.

The general coordinator of the Community Foundation Burate Arriba, in
Bocono, Trujillo state, and communicator with Radio Libertad 99.3 FM in
that area, Valentia Blanco, believes “popular communication came out of the
need to give the communities a voice so that they could practice their
right to communicate... it was necessary to counter the private media which
doesn’t transmit correct or opportune information”.

*Before, they were persecuted*

Escorcia considers the 2002 Regulation of Radio Difusion and Community Open
Television for Public Service and Non Profit a landmark in popular
communication: “That was the first tool that gave those types of media
legality. From that moment popular communication began to grow”.

He said that, even though popular communication existed during the Fourth
Republic governments, it was persecuted.

One of the founders of Catia TV, Leafar Guevara, agreed on that point:
“Community media at that time was illegal”. She commented that that through
such media the possibility to show the struggles and achievements of
communities was opened up.

The director of Radio National Venezuela (RNV) and member of the Necesary
Journalism Movement, Helena Salcedo, has a similar opinion: “Community
journalists were persecuted under the ‘freedom’ of the Fourth Republic. At
that time information was totally hijacked”.

*Sustained growth*

Escorcia said that from 2002 growth of popular media has been blooming.
According to ministry of communication statistics, between that year and
2009, over 200 radio and television operators around Venezuela went to air.

In that regard, the current list of popular media that the National
Telecommunication Commission has on its website includes 244 radio stations
and 36 television stations. Of those, the greatest number of radio stations
are in Zulia state, with 26, followed by Merida wtih 21, and Lara with 19.
In television, the states with more alternative and community channels are
Aragua and Tachira, with 5, followed by Zulia and Miranda with 3.

Regarding printed and digital media, the ministry civil servant said that
there are currently more than 2015 print publications, and around 80
digital ones. “Promotion of popular media is important because its
spokespeople are the ones who are closest to the people”.

Salcedo believes that, thanks to the support of the Bolivarian government
and to popular initiative, growth of this new form of journalism has
allowed for freer and more plural communication to advance. “That’s
democratisation of communication ... popular media practices revolutionary
and transformative action in communities so that the people can discuss not
just their problems, but also solutions”.

*An autonomous movement*

On the support provided by the Bolivarian government to the popular media,
Escorcia pointed out its technical, technological, and educational support.
“The state is a companion in this process. The movement is autonomous and
its respected as such”. He explained that spokespeople of the popular media
in each [regional] state meet and work together.

“We’re very excited because we’re joining together around the country. The
regional assemblies we’re holding are very interesting because they allow
us to find each other,” said Blanco.

Guevara said that popular communicators have been constantly training in
order to produce quality work. “There’s an incipient growth thanks to the
Bolivarian revolution that has opened up the radio-electric space and has
supported the communication initiatives of the people”.

*A story that began with war*

The national day of the journalist is celebrated each year on 27 June in
commemoration of the date when the Correo del Orinco first began to
circulate in 1818. The Correo was a newspaper created by the Republicans
during the War of Independence to spread information about the cause, and
to counter the Gazeta de Caracas, the Royalist publication.

According to the Venezuelan News Agency (AVN), the Correo del Orinoco
published decrees, proclamations, and news that the patriots wanted to
circulate in support of their cause. 128 editions were published since that
first one until the last one on 23 March 1822.

In 1964, the now dead politician and editor of Diario Vea [a left wing
newspaper] Guillermo Garcia Ponce, at the time a member of parliament for
the Communist Party, proposed, from the San Carlos Barracks in Caracas
(where he was prisoner, accused of military rebellion), that the National
Day of the Journalist be celebrated the same day that the Correo del
Orinoco came out for the first time. Thanks to his initiative the date is
celebrated, AVN summarised.

*Extra notes: yesterday's march*

Yesterday's march presented a document by the National Command of Popular
Communication. which rejected media terrorism and warned that if the
capitalist media breaks the law or in any way supports another coup, it
will be taken over by the people. It also supported the “unity of
alternative communicators”.

The document also included proposals for the Government Plan 2013-2019,
which is currently under general discussion, and for the Popular
Communication Law, under discussion in the national assembly.

The National Command consists of spokespeople elected in region assemblies
by alternative and community media workers and collaborators.

*Translation and extra notes by Tamara Pearson for Venezuelanalysis.com.*
 ------------------------------
*Source URL (retrieved on 29/06/2012 - 8:10pm):*
http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/7080


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to