*The Top 4 Reasons Why Israel Launched Attacks on Gaza this week:*

*4. Seizing the Initiative in a Changing Middle East
3. Blocking the Palestinian Move in the UN
2. It's Not Iran, But It Will Do*

*and...*

*1. Did Someone Say Election Campaign? *

*Video:*

*http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=H18kmYNknMY*

*
*

-------------------------------------------------------------


   - Home <http://www.haaretz.com/>
   - Opinion <http://www.haaretz.com/opinion>

 Operation Peace for NetanyahuHere, with perfect timing, organized
precisely now, just two months before the elections, comes an escalation in
the south: Bombing led to the firing of missiles, which led to bombing, and
so on and so forth.
By Tamar Gozansky<http://www.haaretz.com/misc/writers/tamar-gozansky-1.476639>
|
05:35 16.11.12 |  0

Their chests puffed out with importance, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and Defense Minister Ehud Barak announced to the media and the public the
start of another war, this time in Gaza. As was to be expected, the two
waved the time-worn excuse of "a war of no choice," and as was to be
expected, politicians from Kadima and the Labor Party also grabbed onto
this excuse; from their point of view, bombing the Gaza Strip is a reason
to salute the government.

Experience has taught us time and again that at the start of every war, the
government declares festively that this time there will be an end to the
firing of rockets on Israeli towns and villages. But then every time yet
another war comes around that is supposed to solve the problem "once and
for all." Lies follow deception, which follows the intoxicating illusion of
power.

In the past year, Netanyahu and his partners prepared us for a big military
campaign against Iran, explaining to us time after time that Iran is an
"existential threat." But for a war against Iran, it is still necessary to
have an American partner, and that partner, so far, has not given Netanyahu
the go-ahead, and thus, as he announced, the war against Iran has been
delayed until the spring.

But meanwhile there are elections; Netanyahu and Barak apparently said to
themselves, So if there is no war against Iran, how can we arrange things
in a way that suits an election campaign by the right-wing coalition
partners, which embrace the settlers on the one hand and the families of
the tycoons on the other? So here, with perfect timing, organized precisely
now, just two months before the elections, comes an escalation in the
south: Bombing led to the firing of missiles, which led to bombing, and so
on and so forth.

Even the Netanyahu-Lieberman-Barak government knows that the bombing of
Gaza, and even an invasion, by the IDF will not solve any problems. It is
worth recalling that on November 27, 2008, Barak - who was also defense
minister then, in Ehud Olmert's government - declared the beginning of
Operation Cast Lead, that war that was supposed to deal Hamas a decisive
beating. And now, four years later, this same Barak is again waging war,
and again on Gaza. And now, again, they are stuffing us full of the wonders
of assassinations and destruction, so long as they can fool the Israeli
public that this time the problem will be solved.

But the similarity between the war that has just begun and Operation Cast
Lead is not merely the bluff that it will be a matter of "bang and we're
finished." Both now and in 2008, the war had a transparent political aim:
to inflame the public atmosphere and in this way get more votes in the
Knesset elections. Therefore a suitable name for the war that has just
started is "Operation Peace for Netanyahu," or, if you prefer, "Operation
Peace for Netanyahu and Barak," and not the rather poetic name, "Pillar of
Cloud."

War always was, and still is, a very powerful tool for wiping social
problems off the table, for hiding the worsening housing crisis and the
daily price increases for basic commodities, as well as for justifying the
harsh spending cuts in the 2013 budget. In short, they tell us: Sit quietly
and let us waste another NIS 15 billion on another war, and then let us
justify the budget cuts still to come in unemployment benefits, child
allowances, hospital care, education and infrastructure.

Sometimes I wonder: How much longer the two peoples, Israelis and
Palestinians, will have to suffer until the penny drops we finally
understand that military force does not solve the problem of rockets on
Israeli communities, and does not ensure a tranquil childhood for the
children of Sderot and Ashkelon?

During the last war, Operation Cast Lead, we chanted at demonstrations: "In
Gaza and Sderot, the children want to live." I hereby commit myself to
continue chanting that same cry for life in the demonstrations we shall
hold against the present war, and on behalf of peace between Israel and the
Palestinian state that will arise alongside it.

--------------------------------------------------

http://pulsemedia.org/2012/11/16/a-pillar-built-on-sand/


A Pillar Built on Sand

November 16, 2012 § Leave a
Comment<http://pulsemedia.org/2012/11/16/a-pillar-built-on-sand/#respond>

The great John Mearsheimer has a brilliant piece on the LRB
Blog<http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/11/16/john-mearsheimer/a-pillar-built-on-sand/>.
It is the most comprehensive historical and political analysis of recent
developments in Gaza. Two passages in particular bear highlighting. The
first one is about Israel’s long-standing strategy:
<http://thinkpress.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/mearsheimer.jpg>

John Mearsheimer

Israel’s leaders have a two-prong strategy for dealing with their
Palestinian problem. First, they rely on the United States to provide
diplomatic cover, especially in the United Nations. The key to keeping
Washington on board is the Israel
lobby<http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby>,
which pressures American leaders to side with Israel against the
Palestinians and do hardly anything to stop the colonisation of the
Occupied Territories.

The second prong is Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s concept of the ‘Iron Wall’: an
approach that in essence calls for beating the Palestinians into
submission. Jabotinsky understood that the Palestinians would resist the
Zionists’ efforts to colonise their land and subjugate them in the process.
Nonetheless, he maintained that the Zionists, and eventually Israel, could
punish the Palestinians so severely that they would recognise that further
resistance was futile.

Israel has employed this strategy since its founding in 1948, and both Cast
Lead and Pillar of Defence are examples of it at work. In other words,
Israel’s aim in bombing Gaza is not to topple Hamas or eliminate its
rockets, both of which are unrealisable goals. Instead, the ongoing attacks
in Gaza are part of a long-term strategy to coerce the Palestinians into
giving up their pursuit of self-determination and submitting to Israeli
rule in an apartheid state.

The second passage is about the timing of this particular assault:

The timing of the present operation is easy to explain. For starters,
President Obama has just won a second term despite Netanyahu’s transparent
attempt to help Mitt Romney win the election. The prime minister’s mistake
is likely to have hurt his personal relations with the president and might
even threaten America’s ‘special relationship’ with Israel. A war in Gaza,
however, is a good antidote for that problem, because Obama, who faces
daunting economic and political challenges in the months ahead, has little
choice but to back Israel to the hilt and blame the Palestinians.

The Israeli prime minter faces an election of his own in January and asMitchell
Plitnick 
writes<http://www.lobelog.com/continued-us-support-for-israeli-bombing-of-gaza-bodes-ill-for-obamas-second-term/>,
‘Netanyahu’s gambit of forming a joint ticket with the fascist Yisrael
Beiteinu party has not yielded anything close to the polling results he had
hoped for.’* A war over Gaza not only allows Netanyahu to show how tough he
is when Israel’s security is at stake, but it is also likely to have a
‘rally round the flag’ effect, improving his chances of being re-elected.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to