Martin Luther King Jr. 

Speaking on U.S. Militarism

"Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam"  

Sermon at the Ebenezer Baptist Church on April 30th, 1967 (23 Minutes)

One of the Greatest Speeches Ever Given by MLK.

"The Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World Today is My Own Government"
- MLK

 

Video of Martin Luther King's Vietnam speech April 30, 1967
<http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Item
id=74&jumival=4731%20>  

 

 

Martin Luther King on my Film: 

"What I've Learned About U.S. Foreign Policy:

The War Against The Third World"

www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8POmJ46jqk  

 

 

Text of MLK's Speech: "Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam" 

 

The sermon which I am preaching this morning in a sense is not the usual
kind of sermon, but it is a sermon and an important subject, nevertheless,
because the issue that I will be discussing today is one of the most
controversial issues confronting our nation. I'm using as a subject from
which to preach, "Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam."Now, let me make
it clear in the beginning, that I see this war as an unjust, evil, and
futile war. I preach to you today on the war in Vietnam because my
conscience leaves me with no other choice.

The time has come for America to hear the truth about this tragic war.

 

In international conflicts, the truth is hard to come by because most
nations are deceived about themselves. Rationalizations and the incessant
search for scapegoats are the psychological cataracts that blind us to our
sins. But the day has passed for superficial patriotism. He who lives with
untruth lives in spiritual slavery. Freedom is still the bonus we receive
for knowing the truth. "Ye shall know the truth," says Jesus, "and the truth
shall set you free." Now, I've chosen to preach about the war in Vietnam
because I agree with Dante, that the hottest places in hell are reserved for
those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality. There comes
a time when silence becomes betrayal.

 

The truth of these words is beyond doubt, but the mission to which they call
us is a most difficult one. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth,
men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government's policy,
especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great
difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one's own
bosom [and in the surrounding world. Moreover, when the issues at hand seem
as perplexing, as they often do in the case of this dreadful conflict, we're
always on the verge of being mesmerized by uncertainty. But we must move on.
Some of us who have already begun to break the silence of the night have
found that the calling to speak is often a vocation of agony. But we must
speak. We must speak with all the humility that is appropriate to our
limited vision, but we must speak. And we must rejoice as well, for in all
our history there has never been such a monumental dissent during a war, by
the American people.

 

Polls reveal that almost fifteen million Americans explicitly oppose the war
in Vietnam. Additional millions cannot bring themselves around to support
it. And even those millions who do support the war are half-hearted,
confused, and doubt-ridden. This reveals that millions have chosen to move
beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism, to the high grounds of firm
dissent, based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history.
Now, of course, one of the difficulties in speaking out today grows the fact
that there are those who are seeking to equate dissent with disloyalty. It's
a dark day in our nation when high-level authorities will seek to use every
method to silence dissent. But something is happening, and people are not
going to be silenced. The truth must be told, and I say that those who are
seeking to make it appear that anyone who opposes the war in Vietnam is a
fool or a traitor or an enemy of our soldiers is a person that has taken a
stand against the best in our tradition.

 

Yes, we must stand, and we must speak. I have moved to break the betrayal of
my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have
called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam. Many persons
have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. At the heart of their
concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: "Why are you speaking
about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?" Peace
and civil rights don't mix, they say. And so this morning, I speak to you on
this issue, because I am determined to take the Gospel seriously. And I come
this morning to my pulpit to make a passionate plea to my beloved nation.

 

This sermon is not addressed to Hanoi, or to the National Liberation Front.
It is not addressed to China or to Russia. Nor is it an attempt to overlook
the ambiguity of the total situation and the need for a collective solution
to the tragedy of Vietnam. Nor is it an attempt to make North Vietnam or the
National Liberation Front paragons of virtue, nor to overlook the role they
must play in a successful resolution of the problem. This morning, however,
I wish not to speak with Hanoi and the National Liberation Front, but rather
to my fellow Americans, who bear the greatest responsibility, and entered a
conflict that has exacted a heavy price on both continents.

 

Now, since I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I
have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral
vision. There is a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war
in Vietnam and the struggle I and others have been waging in America. A few
years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed that there
was a real promise of hope for the poor, both black and white, through the
Poverty Program. There were experiments, hopes, and new beginnings. Then
came the build-up in Vietnam. And I watched the program broken as if it was
some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. And I knew that
America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation
of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and
skills and money, like some demonic, destructive suction tube. And you may
not know it, my friends, but it is estimated that we spend $500,000 to kill
each enemy soldier, while we spend only fifty-three dollars for each person
classified as poor, and much of that fifty-three dollars goes for salaries
to people that are not poor. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war
as an enemy of the poor, and attack it as such.

 

Perhaps the more tragic recognition of reality took place when it became
clear to me that the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of
the poor at home. It was sending their sons, and their brothers, and their
husbands to fight and die in extraordinarily high proportion relative to the
rest of the population. We were taking the black young men who had been
crippled by society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee
liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in Southwest Georgia
and East Harlem. So we have been repeatedly faced with a cruel irony of
watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together
for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same school
room. So we watch them in brutal solidarity, burning the huts of a poor
village. But we realize that they would hardly live on the same block in
Chicago or Atlanta. Now, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel
manipulation of the poor.

 

My third reason moves to an even deeper level of awareness, for it grows out
of my experience in the ghettos of the North over the last three years
especially the last three summers. As I have walked among the desperate,
rejected, and angry young men, I have told them that Molotov cocktails and
rifles would not solve their problems. I have tried to offer them my deepest
compassion while maintaining my conviction that social change comes most
meaningfully through non-violent action; for they ask and write me, "So what
about Vietnam?" They ask if our nation wasn't using massive doses of
violence to solve its problems to bring about the changes it wanted. Their
questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice
against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without first having
spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my
own government.

 

For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of
the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence I cannot be silent.
Been a lot of applauding over the last few years. They applauded our total
movement; they've applauded me. America and most of its newspapers applauded
me in Montgomery. And I stood before thousands of Negroes getting ready to
riot when my home was bombed and said, we can't do it this way. They
applauded us in the sit-in movement--we non-violently decided to sit in at
lunch counters. The applauded us on the Freedom Rides when we accepted blows
without retaliation. They praised us in Albany and Birmingham and Selma,
Alabama. Oh, the press was so noble in its applause, and so noble in its
praise when I was saying, Be non-violent toward Bull Connor; when I was
saying, Be non-violent toward Selma, Alabama segregationist sheriff Jim
Clark. There's something strangely inconsistent about a nation and a press
that will praise you when you say, Be non-violent toward Jim Clark, but will
curse and damn you when you say, "Be non-violent toward little brown
Vietnamese children. There's something wrong with that press!

 

As if the weight of such a commitment to the life and health of America were
not enough, another burden of responsibility was placed upon me in 1964. And
I cannot forget that the Nobel Peace Prize was not just something taking
place, but it was a commission--a commission to work harder than I had ever
worked before for the brotherhood of Man. This is a calling that takes me
beyond national allegiances. But even if it were not present, I would yet
have to live with the meaning of my commitment to the ministry of Jesus
Christ. To me, the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is
so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why I am speaking
against the war. Could it be that they do not know that the Good News was
meant for all men, for communists and capitalists, for their children and
ours, for black and white, for revolutionary and conservative. Have they
forgotten that my ministry is in obedience to the One who loved His enemies
so fully that he died for them? What, then, can I say to the Vietcong, or to
Castro, or to Mao, as a faithful minister to Jesus Christ? Can I threaten
them with death, or must I not share with them my life? Finally, I must be
true to my conviction that I share with all men the calling to be the son of
the Living God. Beyond the calling of race or nation or creed is this
vocation of sonship and brotherhood. And because I believe that the Father
is deeply concerned, especially for His suffering and helpless and outcast
children, I come today to speak for them. And as I ponder the madness of
Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond in
compassion, my mind goes constantly to the people of that peninsula. 

I speak not now of the soldiers of each side, not of the military government
of Saigon, but simply of the people who have been under the curse of war for
almost three continuous decades now. 

I think of them, too, because it is clear to me that there will be no
meaningful solution until some attempt is made to know these people and hear
their broken cries.

 

Now, let me tell you the truth about it. They must see Americans as strange
liberators. Do you realize that the Vietnamese people proclaimed their own
independence in 1945 after a combined French and Japanese occupation. And
incidentally, this was before the Communist revolution in China. They were
led by Ho Chi Minh. And this is a little-known fact, and these people
declared themselves independent in 1945. They quoted our Declaration of
Independence in their document of freedom, and yet our government refused to
recognize them. President Truman said they were not ready for independence.
So we fell victim as a nation at that time of the same deadly arrogance that
has poisoned the international situation for all of these years. France then
set out to reconquer its former colony. And they fought eight long, hard,
brutal years trying to re-conquer Vietnam. You know who helped France? It
was the United States of America. It came to the point that we were meeting
more than eighty percent of the war costs. And even when France started
despairing of its reckless action, we did not. And in 1954, a conference was
called at Geneva, and an agreement was reached, because France had been
defeated at Dien Bien Phu. But even after that, and after the Geneva Accord,
we did not stop. We must face the sad fact that our government sought, in a
real sense, to sabotage the Geneva Accord. Well, after the French were
defeated, it looked as if independence and land reform would come through
the Geneva agreement. But instead the United States came and started
supporting a man named Diem who turned out to be one of the most ruthless
dictators in the history of the world. He set out to silence all opposition.
People were brutally murdered because they raised their voices against the
brutal policies of Diem. And the peasants watched and cringed as Diem
ruthlessly rooted out all opposition. The peasants watched as all this was
presided over by United States influence and by increasing numbers of United
States troops who came to help quell the insurgency that Diem's methods had
aroused. When Diem was overthrown, they may have been happy, but the long
line of military dictatorships seemed to offer no real change, especially in
terms of their need for land and peace.] And who are we supporting in
Vietnam today? It's a man by the name of general, Ky Air Vice Marshal Nguyen
Cao Ky who fought with the French against his own people, and who said on
one occasion that the greatest hero of his life is Hitler. This is who we
are supporting in Vietnam today. Oh, our government and the press generally
won't tell us these things, but God told me to tell you this morning. The
truth must be told.

 

The only change came from America as we increased our troop commitments in
support of governments which were singularly corrupt, inept, and without
popular support and all the while the people read our leaflets and received
regular promises of peace and democracy and land reform. Now they languish
under our bombs and consider us, not their fellow Vietnamese, the real
enemy. They move sadly and apathetically as we heard them off the land of
their fathers into concentration camps, where minimal social needs are
rarely met. They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs. So they
go, primarily women, and children and the aged. They watch as we poison
their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as
the bulldozers roar through their areas preparing to destroy the precious
trees. They wander into the towns and see thousands of thousands of the
children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like
animals. 

 

They see the children degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They
see the children selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their
mothers. We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family
and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. We have
cooperated in the crushing of the nation's only noncommunist revolutionary
political force, the United Buddhist Church. This is a role our nation has
taken, the role of those who make peaceful revolutions impossible but
refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that comes from the
immense profits of overseas investments. I'm convinced that if we are to get
on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a
radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a
thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and
computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important
than people, the giant triplets of racism, militarism and economic
exploitation are incapable of being conquered.

 

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and
justice of many of our present policies. On the one hand, we are called to
play the Good Samaritan on life's roadside, but that will be only an initial
act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho Road must be changed
so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make
their journey on life's highway. True compassion is more than flinging a
coin to a beggar. A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the
glaring contrast of poverty and wealth with righteous indignation. It will
look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing
huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the
profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and
say, "This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry
of Latin America and say, "This is not just." The Western arrogance of
feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from
them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world
order and say of war, "This way of settling differences is not just." This
business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes
with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins
of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody
battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be
reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year
after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of
social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

 

Oh, my friends, if there is any one thing that we must see today is that
these are revolutionary times. All over the globe men are revolting against
old systems of exploitation and oppression, and out of the wounds of a frail
world, new systems of justice and equality are being born. The shirtless and
barefoot people of the land are rising up as never before. The people who
sat in darkness have seen a great light. They are saying, unconsciously, as
we say in one of our freedom songs, "Ain't gonna let nobody turn me around!"
It is a sad fact that because of comfort, complacency, a morbid fear of
communism, our proneness to adjust to injustice, the Western nations that
initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now
become the arch anti-revolutionaries. This has driven many to feel that only
Marxism has a revolutionary spirit. Therefore, communism is a judgment
against our failure to make democracy real and follow through on the
revolutions that we initiated. Our only hope today lies in our ability to
recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out into a sometimes hostile world
declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism, and militarism. With this
powerful commitment we shall boldly challenge the status quo, we shall
boldly challenge unjust mores, and thereby speed up the day when "every
valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low, and
the rough places shall be made plain, and the crooked places straight. And
the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it
together."

 

A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our
loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must
now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve
the best in their individual societies. This call for a worldwide fellowship
that lifts neighborly concern beyond one's tribe, race, class, and nation is
in reality a call for an all-embracing, unconditional love for all men. This
oft misunderstood and misinterpreted concept, so readily dismissed by the
Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force, has now become an
absolute necessity for the survival of mankind. And when I speak of love I'm
not speaking of some sentimental and weak response. I am speaking of that
force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying
principle of life. Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads
to ultimate reality. This Hindu-Muslim-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief
about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of
John: "Let us love one another, for God is love. And every one that loveth
is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God, for God
is love. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us and his love is
perfected in us."

 

Let me say finally that I oppose the war in Vietnam because I love America.
I speak out against this war, not in anger, but with anxiety and sorrow in
my heart, and, above all, with a passionate desire to see our beloved
country stand as the moral example of the world. I speak out against this
war because I am disappointed with America. And there can be no great
disappointment where there is not great love. I am disappointed with our
failure to deal positively and forthrightly with the triple evils of racism,
economic exploitation, and militarism. We are presently moving down a
dead-end road that can lead to national disaster. America has strayed to the
far country of racism and militarism. The home that all too many Americans
left was solidly structured idealistically; its pillars were solidly
grounded in the insights of our Judeo-Christian heritage. All men are made
in the image of God. All men are bothers. All men are created equal. Every
man is an heir to a legacy of dignity and worth. Every man has rights that
are neither conferred by, nor derived from the State--they are God-given.
Out of one blood, God made all men to dwell upon the face of the earth. What
a marvelous foundation for any home! What a glorious and healthy place to
inhabit. But America's strayed away, and this unnatural excursion has
brought only confusion and bewilderment. It has left hearts aching with
guilt and minds distorted with irrationality.

 

It is time for all people of conscience to call upon America to come back
home. Come home, America. I call on Washington today. I call on every man
and woman of good will all over America today. I call on the young men of
America who must make a choice today to take a stand on this issue. Tomorrow
may be too late. And don't let anybody make you think that God chose America
as his divine, messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world.
God has a way of standing before the nations with judgment, and it seems
that I can hear God saying to America, "You're too arrogant! And if you
don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power,
and I'll place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name.
Be still and know that I'm God."

 

Now it isn't easy to stand up for truth and for justice. Sometimes it means
being frustrated. When you tell the truth and take a stand, sometimes it
means that you will walk the streets with a burdened heart. Sometimes it
means losing a job...means being abused and scorned. It may mean having a
seven, eight year old child asking a daddy, "Why do you have to go to jail
so much?"  I've long since learned that to be a follower to the Jesus Christ
means taking up the cross. And my bible tells me that Good Friday comes
before Easter. Before the crown we wear, there is the cross that we must
bear. Let us bear it, bear it for truth, bear it for justice, and bear it
for peace. Let us go out this morning with that determination. And I have
not lost faith. I'm not in despair, because I know that there is a moral
order. I haven't lost faith, because the arc of the moral universe is long,
but it bends toward justice. We shall overcome because William Cullen Bryant
was right: "Truth pressed to earth will rise again." We shall overcome
because James Russell Lowell was right: "Truth forever on the scaffold,
wrong forever on the throne." Yet, that scaffold sways the future. We shall
overcome because the bible is right: "You shall reap what you sow." With
this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of
hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of
our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will
be able to speed up the day when justice will roll down like waters, and
righteousness like a mighty stream. With this faith we will be able to speed
up the day when the lion and the lamb will lie down together, and every man
will sit under his own vine and fig tree, and none shall be afraid because
the words of the Lord have spoken it. With this faith we will be able to
speed up the day when all over the world we will be able to join hands and
sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last! Free at last!
Thank God Almighty, we're free at last!" With this faith, we'll sing it as
we're getting ready to sing it now. Men will beat their swords into
plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. And nations will not rise up
against nations, neither shall they study war anymore. And I don't know
about you, I ain't gonna study war no more.

 

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to