http://www.marxist.com/another-fine-mess-budget-crisis-united-states.htm


“Another fine mess” Budget Crisis in the United
States<http://www.marxist.com/another-fine-mess-budget-crisis-united-states.htm>
Written by Rob SewellMonday, 04 March 2013
[image: 
Print]<http://www.marxist.com/another-fine-mess-budget-crisis-united-states/print.htm>[image:
E-mail]<http://www.marxist.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,16731075601acf7f1473c263ef49591f5e8734a6/tmpl,component/>

Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad, goes the saying. It is
an apt description of the warring factions of the US political
establishment, especially the Republicans, who are engaged in a ferocious
battle over the government budget, and to hell with the consequences.

[image: Sequester day. Photo; Ryan
Lintelman]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/usa/Washington_sequester_day-Ryan_Lintelman.jpg>Sequester
day. Photo: Ryan
Lintelman<http://www.marxist.com/%5Ehttp:/www.flickr.com/photos/ryanlintelman/>Astonishingly,
like a scene from a Laurel and Hardy slapstick movie, this fiscal “war”
between the Establishment parties threatens near paralysis in the world’s
largest economy.

As a result of a last-minute “compromise” deal to avoid a “fiscal cliff” in
the stand-off in August 2011, the latest failure to reach a deal has forced
the White House as of 1st March to introduce “sequestration”, a term
describing automatic across board cuts in public spending (half from
discretionary programmes and half from defence) to the tune of $85bn by
September of this year, but amounting to $1.2 trillion over the next
decade. These cuts will, with massive attacks especially on Medicare and
welfare, deliver roughly a $2.5tn deficit reduction over these ten years.
Even then, the total US debt as a percentage of GDP will continue to rise.

While both Republicans and Democrats are united in the need for cuts and
attacks on the working class, they are deeply divided over tactics on how
best to carry them out. This failure to compromise and agree on such
tactics, death by hanging or death by a thousand cuts, has produced the
latest fiscal mess.

“The sequester was written in a way that would ensure that Congress would
never let it happen”, stated Jay Carney, a White House spokesman. But it
has.

This “sequestration” now risks derailing the present weak “recovery”. If
implemented it will be a massive blow to the US economy, which has been
struggling for nearly four years to drag itself out of the deepest slump.
But with US growth at l.5% last year, cuts on such a scale, as we can see
in Europe, will throw any recovery into reverse. Even now, the
Congressional Budget Office projects only 1.4% growth in 2013, leaving
aside the effects of sequestration. Some have described the present
situation as a slow-motion train wreck, which seems an accurate description.

“I don’t anticipate a huge financial crisis,” said President Obama, with
little confidence as he looks over the abyss. “But people are going to be
hurt. The economy will not grow as quickly as it would have. Unemployment
will not go down as quickly as it would have.”

While the economy has experienced a small recovery, with the fall in last
quarter’s GDP revised upwards to a 0.1% growth, things are looking very
fragile. Growth in other parts of the world is faltering, starting with
China. In Europe, we have austerity, rising unemployment and deepening
recession.

US consumer spending increased in January, but this looks like a blip, as
incomes rose by 2.6% in December as companies moved to beat the payroll
tax. This was immediately followed in January by the biggest fall in
incomes in 20 years since 1993, with a drop of 3.6%. People are living off
their savings, but this cannot last. The sequestration cuts will certainly
eat into demand, pulling money out of the economy of people who spend it.

The sequestration will be a big blow to this, with more than one million
civilian federal workers could be given unpaid leave starting in April.
Some 800,000 civilian Pentagon workers will be sent home without pay. Each
US state will face problems. In Virginia, 90,000 civilian defence staff
will be put on unpaid leave. In Georgia, 4,180 children will not receive
their routine vaccinations. In Texas, 930 teaching jobs will be cut. Fire
fighters and police officers will be laid off as, in the words of Obama,
the sequestration takes a “meat cleaver” to the US government. There will
be a 9.4% cut in benefit cheques, especially hardest affecting the 3.8m
Americans who have been unemployed for more than six months. There will be
lay-offs of dairy inspectors which could paralyse the meat and dairy
industry, creating scarcities and forcing up prices. “The effects will be
significant, and people will feel them”, said John Hickenlooper, governor
of Colorado.

The sequestration cuts are across the board, affecting all government
agency budgets, with few exceptions. This gives little room for manoeuvre.
It was meant not to provide any flexibility, which some Republicans are
worried about. “We have intelligence operations that could get slowed down
or stopped”, said Mike Rogers, Republican chairman of the intelligence
committee. “That’s a problem.” It will also affect defence spending.
Federal workers will be the hardest hit. There is usually a 30-day notice
period for unpaid leave, so those actions are likely to kick in in April,
if the crisis is not resolved by then.

A number of states are already on the brink of bankrupcy. The governor of
Michigan has declared a fiscal emergency in Detroit, which could lead to
municipal bankruptcy, the largest in US history. In November 2011,
Jefferson County, Alabama, filed the largest bankruptcy to date, involving
$3.14bn in bonds. Three Californian cities – San Bernardino, Mammoth Lake
and Stockton – also filed for bankruptcy. Clearly more will follow suit.

How did the American ruling class get itself into such a political
deadlock? The Republican Party has almost changed beyond recognition over
the last decade or more, with the rise of the Tea Party fundamentalists.
These backwoods men and women are virulently opposed to any increase in
spending and are demanding huge cuts, especially to health and welfare.
They wield a large influence within the ranks of the Republican Party and
have used their muscle to put pressure on the Republican Congress to
systematically block any compromise over government spending. Obama and the
Democrats are not innocent either. They agreed to the sequestration and
added the threat of automatic cuts. They are in favour of making cuts, but
want to increase taxes on the wealthiest, to which the Republicans are
adamantly opposed. This has produced a series of crises and threatened
shut-downs of government as agreement on the state budget has periodically
broken down.

In the past, the two parties of American big business have easily reached
compromises. But as Sarah Binder of the Brookings Institution said: “that
was when moderates made up about 30 to 40 per cent of both chambers.” That
is not the case today. Many Republicans view Obama as a radical or
“socialist”, which is clearly not the case. It shows how far Republican
views have shifted, to the chagrin of the US ruling class, who want an end
to this constant conflict. However, those involved see sequestration as the
best place to pick a fight and “stand on principles”.

In the past couple of years, instead of a comprehensive agreement, Congress
and the White House have experienced a succession of rolling budget crises,
forcing them to implement piecemeal deficit reduction steps. In January,
they agreed on income tax increases for households earning more than
$450,000 a year, the first time Republicans have voted for higher taxes in
more than 20 years. At each crisis point, a last minute a compromise has
been reached, but this is becoming more difficult with each new crisis.
Republicans vowed that their January compromise would never be repeated.
Relations have become embittered and there has been a real breakdown in
relations between Obama and the Republican leadership in Congress.

There seems to be no immediate solution. Even the President seems to think
this could play out over weeks and months. “It may take a couple of weeks.
It may take a couple of months”, he said. There appears to be an assumption
that the deepening crisis and growing layoffs will knock heads together and
produce a compromise as before. “Once the pain of sequestration begins and
constituents begin to complain, politicians tend to bend quickly”,
explained Chris Krueger, an analyst. This seems to be the most likely
outcome, although they are playing a risky game, with Republican
anti-taxation groups such as Americans for Prosperity and the Club for
Growth barking at their heels.

How long is this situation going to last? There is a new deadline on 27th March
where Congress has to renew funding for the government, which, if left
unresolved, would lead to a partial shutdown of federal agencies in
addition to the sequestration cuts. They will want to avoid this at all
costs, but both sides are into brinkmanship. They are in practise making it
more difficult to strike a deal, but the alternative is too drastic to
contemplate.

Wall Street is clutching its head. The US Federal Reserve does not know
which way to turn. One month they are proposing another round of
quantitative easing, and the next they are fretting about the dangers of
such a policy. In such uncertain and dangerous times as these, the ruling
class cannot afford an on-going crisis. The most intelligent sections look
with incredulity at the current position, but seem powerless to resolve it.
The American bourgeoisie will need to take firm action to put an end to
this mess and compel a “grand bargain”. While such action can temporarily
resolve this or that crisis, they are presently stuck with their unstable
political representatives, a sure recipe for dangerous disruption in the
future.

These days, the US governs by crisis, a reflection of the impasse of the
system. This endemic crisis is not lost on the working class. Sooner or
later they will see the need to break with the two-party system and create
a political party of their own. Such a development would transform the
situation in the United States. Socialism will inevitably find a rebirth on
American soil and offer a real way out of this impending chaos.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to