Manning: Guilty of Aiding Democracy

June 5, 2013
Because democracy is dependent on an informed electorate, political control in 
advanced societies like the United States has focused on selective 
dissemination of information and ideological spin. A whistleblower like Pvt. 
Bradley Manning disrupts that process, says Norman Solomon.


By Norman Solomon

Of all the charges against Bradley Manning, the most pernicious — and revealing 
— is “aiding the enemy.” A blogger at The New Yorker, Amy Davidson, raised a 
pair of big questions that now loom over the courtroom at Fort Meade and over 
the entire country:

–“Would it aid the enemy, for example, to expose war crimes committed by 
American forces or lies told by the American government?”


Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg.

–“In that case, who is aiding the enemy — the whistleblower or the perpetrators 
themselves?”

When the deceptive operation of the warfare state can’t stand the light of day, 
truth-tellers are a constant hazard. And culpability must stay turned on its 
head. That’s why accountability was upside-down when the U.S. Army prosecutor 
laid out the government’s case against Bradley Manning in an opening statement:

“This is a case about a soldier who systematically harvested hundreds of 
thousands of classified documents and dumped them onto the Internet, into the 
hands of the enemy – material he knew, based on his training, would put the 
lives of fellow soldiers at risk.”

If so, those fellow soldiers have all been notably lucky; the Pentagon has 
admitted that none died as a result of Manning’s leaks in 2010. But many of his 
fellow soldiers lost their limbs or their lives in U.S. warfare made possible 
by the kind of lies that the U.S. government is now prosecuting Bradley Manning 
for exposing.

In the real world, as Glenn Greenwald has pointed out, prosecution for leaks is 
extremely slanted. “Let’s apply the government’s theory in the Manning case to 
one of the most revered journalists in Washington: Bob Woodward, who has become 
one of America’s richest reporters, if not the richest, by obtaining and 
publishing classified information far more sensitive than anything WikiLeaks 
has ever published,” Greenwald wrote in January.

He noted that “one of Woodward’s most enthusiastic readers was Osama bin 
Laden,” as a 2011 video from al-Qaeda made clear. And Greenwald added that “the 
same Bob Woodward book [Obama’s Wars] that Osama bin Laden obviously read and 
urged everyone else to read disclosed numerous vital national security secrets 
far more sensitive than anything Bradley Manning is accused of leaking.

Doesn’t that necessarily mean that top-level government officials who served as 
Woodward’s sources, and the author himself, aided and abetted al-Qaida?”

But the prosecution of Manning is about carefully limiting the information that 
reaches the governed. Officials who run U.S. foreign policy choose exactly what 
classified info to dole out to the public. They leak like self-serving sieves 
to mainline journalists such as Woodward, who has divulged plenty of “Top 
Secret” information – a category of classification higher than anything Bradley 
Manning is accused of leaking.

While pick-and-choose secrecy is serving Washington’s top war-makers, the 
treatment of U.S. citizens is akin to the classic description of how to 
propagate mushrooms: keeping them in the dark and feeding them bullshit.

In effect, for top managers of the warfare state, “the enemy” is democracy.

Let’s pursue the inquiry put forward by columnist Amy Davidson early this year. 
If it is aiding the enemy “to expose war crimes committed by American forces or 
lies told by the American government,” then in reality “who is aiding the enemy 
– the whistleblower or the perpetrators themselves?”

Candid answers to such questions are not only inadmissible in the military 
courtroom where Bradley Manning is on trial. Candor is also excluded from the 
national venues where the warfare state preens itself as virtue’s paragon.

Yet ongoing actions of the U.S. government have hugely boosted the propaganda 
impact and recruiting momentum of forces that Washington publicly describes as 
“the enemy.” Policies under the Bush and Obama administrations – in Iraq, 
Afghanistan, Yemen and beyond, with hovering drones, missile strikes and night 
raids, at prisons such as Abu Ghraib, Bagram, Guantanamo and secret rendition 
torture sites – have “aided the enemy” on a scale so enormous that it makes the 
alleged (and fictitious) aid to named enemies from Manning’s leaks 
infinitesimal in comparison.

Blaming the humanist PFC messenger for “aiding the enemy” is an exercise in 
self-exculpation by an administration that cannot face up to its own vast war 
crimes.

While prosecuting Bradley Manning, the prosecution may name al-Qaeda, 
indigenous Iraqi forces, the Taliban or whoever. But the unnamed “enemy” — the 
real adversary that the Pentagon and the Obama White House  are so eager to 
quash – is the incessant striving for democracy that requires informed consent 
of the governed.

The forces that top U.S. officials routinely denounce as “the enemy” will never 
threaten the power of the USA’s dominant corporate-military elites. But the 
unnamed “enemy” aided by Bradley Manning’s courageous actions – the people at 
the grassroots who can bring democracy to life beyond rhetoric – are a real 
potential threat to that power.

Accusations of aid and comfort to the enemy were profuse after Martin Luther 
King Jr. moved forward to expose the Johnson administration’s deceptions and 
the U.S. military’s atrocities. Most profoundly, with his courageous stand 
against the war in Vietnam, King earned his Nobel Peace Prize during the years 
after he won it in 1964.

Bradley Manning may never win the Nobel Peace Prize, but he surely deserves it. 
Close to 60,000 people have already signed a petition urging the Norwegian 
Nobel Committee to award the prize to Manning. To become a signer, click here.

Also, you can preview a kindred project on the “I Am Bradley Manning” site, 
where a just-released short video – the first stage of a longer film due out 
soon – features Daniel Ellsberg, Oliver Stone, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Phil Donahue, 
Alice Walker, Peter Sarsgaard, Wallace Shawn, Russell Brand, Moby, Tom Morello, 
Michael Ratner, Molly Crabapple, Davey D, Tim DeChristopher, Josh Stieber, Lt. 
Dan Choi, Hakim Green, Matt Taibbi, Chris Hedges, Allan Nairn, Leslie Cagan, 
Ahdaf Soueif and Jeff Madrick.

>From many walks of life, our messages will become louder and clearer as 
>Bradley Manning’s trial continues. He is guilty of “aiding the enemy” only if 
>the enemy is democracy.

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the 
Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include War Made Easy: How Presidents 
and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to